Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

News 368 Economists sign letter opposing Kerry (6 Nobel laureates)

  1. Oct 14, 2004 #1
    Take this for what you think it's worth.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/release_bc04_economists.html [Broken]

    The 368 signatories are shown at the linked site.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 14, 2004 #2
    Can you really trust a website such as nationalreview.com? 99% of the garbage that is out there on the internet is unreliable or sketchy information.

    Budget deficits inhibit capital formation and decrease productivity growth in the long run because of crowding out effects. Why doesn't that website mention that Bush's enormous budget deficits will stunt economic growth in the long run? Why doesn't that website mention the fact that budget deficits also cause trade deficits to worsen, i.e. twin deficits? Bush's fiscal policies have created enormous budget and trade deficits. If you actually go to the home page of that website, it is flaming right wing and partisan. I never trust nonpartisan information. What is Bush's solution to the problem? More tax cuts that will worsen the deficits? The fact is that Bush's tax cuts didn't even work. If you go to the Bureau of Economic Analysis' website you will see that Bush's tax cuts of 2001 didn't do anything, people simply just saved them instead of spending it. Tax cuts his, according to the economic history of the United States, have done nothing, people just save it instead of spending it (Ricardian equivalence). The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office is predicting that over 10 years, Bush's fiscal policies will cost the government over 2 trillion dollars in deficits. What is Bush's solution to that? Any highschooler who has taken a basic class on economics, knows that in order to close the deficit either taxes would have to be raised or cut spending. Bush, apparently, can do neither. He has never vetoed 1 spending bill and has an addiction with cutting taxes.

    You can show me 6 nobel laureates who endorse Bush, I can show you 10 NOBEL PRIZE WINNING economists who endorse Kerry:
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2004
  4. Oct 14, 2004 #3


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I'm not a Kerry fan (clearly), but this is a meaningless publicity stunt as the link gravenwworld showed. One can hand around a letter that says damn near anything and get professionals to sign it (see: The Disclosure Project).
  5. Oct 14, 2004 #4


    User Avatar

    Your source is extremely unreliable. The credibility of your post is undermined by your source. Try finding a non-partisan source for your news next time.
  6. Oct 14, 2004 #5
    How does the source affect the letter? Maybe I'm missing something here --
  7. Oct 14, 2004 #6
    Agree or disagree with the contents of the letter and the signatories ---- how does the messanger affect the contents?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook