- #1

- 92

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Courses
- Thread starter budala
- Start date

- #1

- 92

- 0

- #2

cristo

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 8,122

- 74

- #3

- 92

- 0

Ontario , Canada

3rd year ,5th semester Electrical Engineering. Thanks

3rd year ,5th semester Electrical Engineering. Thanks

- #4

- 980

- 2

- #5

- 486

- 0

During my undergrad year, I took on average 7 courses per semester.

- #6

- 218

- 0

In the 5th semester I took 6 courses.

- #7

- 3,042

- 15

I take 4 a semester. 4 is more than enough for me, cuz Im dumb.

Fire truck.

Fire truck.

- #8

- 1,629

- 1

Freshman year, sophmore year I could handle 6, jr. 4.

Since I'm transferring (and I need to graduate ASAP) I'm going to take 5 core comp sci courses it should be fun.

- #9

- 306

- 1

- #10

- 502

- 1

4 courses per semester. We are allowed to take at most 5 courses per semester but very few do.

- #11

- 329

- 1

- #12

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,208

- 1,414

2 or 3 is about all i can follow.

- #13

G01

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 2,682

- 16

I guess I'd say five is my ideal. It's enough to keep me from getting bored, but not overly hard to keep up with all of them.

- #14

- 240

- 0

- #15

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,208

- 1,414

- #16

- 306

- 1

- #17

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,208

- 1,414

even in undergrad school, some of us began with grad courses, i enrolled in ym first one as a firsts emester freshman, and my more advanced colleagues took them for several years as undergrads.

so for advanced science students, it is often advised to take grad rstehr than udnergrad courses, and then they would be facing the same time demands as grad stduents, onlky without the commitment.

i.e. a successful undergrad career at the high level, often involves taking grad courses, and one needs to do well in them.

anyway i do not agree that rgad courses are so much harder for the grad student than undergrad courses are for the undergrad. i just do not believe there are many undergrads out there who can profitably take honors calculus ala spivak, and honors physics ala feynman, honors chemistry, plus honors writing, maybe a language like russian or german, and also a demanding philosophy course which reads a book or more a week like the illiad or republic.

these were the kinds of courses we took as freshmen at harvard, and i think we were taking too many of them at 4 1/2, much less 6. i gues it is my turn of mind but i like to think about what i am taking, not just listen to surveys, and never get into it.

i.e. to me learning is about understanding, not just exposure. and i think for most undergrads, the last two years are also about deep investigation, maybe writing a thesis. 6 courses at that time seems silly to me.

in fact i question how much oppenheimer got out of his vaunted 7 harvard courses. i tried unsuccessfully to see a list of what he took last night. but apprently he was a voracious reader who did little else but study.

in my day too, there were a few people who entered the library in the morning and left only at night when it closed, every day. this may even be thought unhealthy, and i worry abiut some of our young members here who speak of nothing but study.

- #18

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,208

- 1,414

- #19

- 350

- 0

Or do they take grad level courses in place of their equivalent undergrad courses? for example, instead of taking undergrad real analysis, do they take graduate level instead? and in the process skip alot of undergrad courses. if so, wouldnt that be extremely difficult?

- #20

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,208

- 1,414

to get an undergraduate degree requires a certain number of hours. these hours may be taken from graduate courses if one is qualified.

you cannot stop and receive an undergraduate degree just because you are advanced enough to take grad courses. also undergrad school is more fun than grad school and it is prudent to spend all 4 years there among friends and girls, and extracurricular activities.

yes it is difficult, but that is what top people do at top places. it was fairly standard for the better math majors at harvard to take graduate reals and complex and algebra and algebraic topology, as juniors and seniors.

if you look at the content of the grad courses now given at harvard in these topics you may see that their grad courses now assume one has already had what are considered grad courses at other places. e.g. at other places grad comple teaches cauchys theorem, residue theory and elementary matters like that, and at harvard they may do sheaf cohomology, oka's theorem and nevanlinna theory.

so to even aspire to admission at a top grad school, one may need to arrive knowing hat is called graduate material at ones own school.

i once had a high school student who was also enrolled at uga in my graduate algebra course. he was the ebst in there, and graduated somehow simultaneously from high school and uga undergrad, and went straight to UCLA grad school at 17, without ever actually enrolling as an undergrad on campus.

i thought this a serious mistake, as he lost a lot of fun time from his life, indeed is probably the most fun most people ever have. they are pon campus with thousands of other kids, young and energetic, amonf=g stimuaklting people, and with ideally none of the responsibilities of adults.

you cannot stop and receive an undergraduate degree just because you are advanced enough to take grad courses. also undergrad school is more fun than grad school and it is prudent to spend all 4 years there among friends and girls, and extracurricular activities.

yes it is difficult, but that is what top people do at top places. it was fairly standard for the better math majors at harvard to take graduate reals and complex and algebra and algebraic topology, as juniors and seniors.

if you look at the content of the grad courses now given at harvard in these topics you may see that their grad courses now assume one has already had what are considered grad courses at other places. e.g. at other places grad comple teaches cauchys theorem, residue theory and elementary matters like that, and at harvard they may do sheaf cohomology, oka's theorem and nevanlinna theory.

so to even aspire to admission at a top grad school, one may need to arrive knowing hat is called graduate material at ones own school.

i once had a high school student who was also enrolled at uga in my graduate algebra course. he was the ebst in there, and graduated somehow simultaneously from high school and uga undergrad, and went straight to UCLA grad school at 17, without ever actually enrolling as an undergrad on campus.

i thought this a serious mistake, as he lost a lot of fun time from his life, indeed is probably the most fun most people ever have. they are pon campus with thousands of other kids, young and energetic, amonf=g stimuaklting people, and with ideally none of the responsibilities of adults.

Last edited:

- #21

- 441

- 0

not to say that I don't enjoy learning about philosohpy and such, its just that I woud rather learn it from another philosohpy major over a beer and a cigar then in a classroom.

- #22

- 486

- 0

Share: