Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

8 + 6 How many is too many?

  1. Jan 29, 2009 #1

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=6764771&page=1

    If true as reported ... why would anyone apparently take fertility drugs with 6 already?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 29, 2009 #2

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's appalling. It seems she may have bought the fertiltiy drugs illegally. No accredited clinic would do such a thing, supposedly. Perhaps she's mentally ill a la Angelina Jolie with her insane desire to keep popping out kids?
     
  4. Jan 29, 2009 #3

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The report does not say she took fertility drugs.
     
  5. Jan 29, 2009 #4
    BTW, I think that makes 14. She may just be blessed by the God of fertility as well.
     
  6. Jan 29, 2009 #5

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    And Jolie has popped out 3 children (including twins) and adopted 3 from Cambodia, Ethiopia and Vietnam (all were living in orphanages). I don't see the similarity between the two cases, or the basis for a diagnosis of insanity.
     
  7. Jan 29, 2009 #6

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I'm fairly certain it was reported elsewhere. I believe in the interview with the doctors after delivery on MSNBC. Something to the effect that you don't have 8 without chemical assistance.
     
  8. Jan 29, 2009 #7

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Well Bradgelina do have the resources to care for about as many as they want to pop out or adopt. It wouldn't be my choice, but if that is how they want to fill their lives, ...

    But in this case 14 kids in a 3 bedroom house?

    That will definitely affect the resale value of the home.
     
  9. Jan 29, 2009 #8
    I dont know about the U.S. but in Canada it would be questioned whether she should be allowed to keep them all as a single mom with only 1 income in a 3 bedroom house...
    I cant imagine giving birth to one and ever wanting to do it again, let alone do it again 8 times in a row...
     
  10. Jan 30, 2009 #9

    FredGarvin

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    This goes right up there with the sick-o's in Arkansas or wherever that have 16 kids and keep going. This is a sickness. This is nature's way of the need to porpagate the species taken to an absurd level.
     
  11. Jan 30, 2009 #10

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Used to be in a more agrarian world that large families meant a ready made workforce. Increase the brood of kids like growing a herd of milk cows. With disease being treated haphazardly, getting all the kids to adulthood was undoubtedly a challenge.

    For instance I look at my family tree and see family sizes of 5 to 9 kids through the 18th and 19th century and I don't think that was really all that uncommon. (And maybe 1 sometimes 2 pre-adult deaths per generation as I recall.) And they were for the most part farm owners. But the twentieth century saw my forbears have just 2 and 3 kids a generation. I think, without researching it, that experience likely mirrors, society generally as it developed and expanded with US manifest destiny.

    The thing that I have to wonder about now though is the idea that there may be some procreation going on out there that may be motivated by the idea that births are a perverse source of revenue in the form of welfare. Like gee if I had more kids I could get more food stamps, and subsidies. Hence I don't know that it is necessarily sick so much as narcissistic and ill considered.
     
  12. Jan 30, 2009 #11

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes, it does.

     
  13. Jan 30, 2009 #12

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Family: Octuplets' mother has 6 other children
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090130/ap_on_re_us/octuplets

    Hay caramba! So what about the father(s)?

    If she's not married, why the heck is she taking fertility treatment?
     
  14. Jan 30, 2009 #13

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You're right. I have no idea how I missed that paragraph. Thanks for pointing it out.
     
  15. Jan 30, 2009 #14
    Is that a conservative opinion there? Are couples who are not tied, not allowed to have children? Marriage these days is seen by many as little more than a tax break I think. A lot of people get married simply because it's a social convention at least in the UK, it certainly isn't in the majority of cases religious. If you think about it in a detached manner, apart from the legal and financial incentives, what is the difference between living with someone forever and being married?
     
  16. Jan 30, 2009 #15

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I suppose some might consider my opinion conservative. So be it.

    Actually, it's simply a matter of responsibility.

    I'm also just curious about the absence of the father(s). For me, if I get a woman pregnant, I'm committed to that woman and child (or children) until I stop breathing.

    I certainly don't know all the details, but I have to wonder if she is expecting to be supported by the state. It's one thing to have 14 children and support them oneself (which I don't see a single adult doing), but it's quite another matter to have numerous children and expect others to support one's children. It seems it's selfish.

    If I'm going to live with someone forever, I'm going to get married (which I did going on 27 years + 1 year of being engaged while living apart except for weekends and holidays). Beyond legal and financial matters, it's simply a matter of commitment.

    I've seen many people who live together (as well as married), and then split up. It seems, based on what I've observed, that when a couple co-habits, one or both is not necessarily committed to a long-term, exclusive relationship (I've seen that in marriages too).
     
  17. Jan 30, 2009 #16
    I see I agree with your concerns about a partner, but I suspect the treatment wouldn't have been tried if she didn't have a long term partner. Not sure though. If you think about it a lesbian couple would probably have the same issues, so it doesn't really matter about marriage.

    As for your views about marriage I'm pretty sure you are not alone.

    However it's possible to make a commitment without it being legally binding, it's possible to live have children and die without ever being married, the difference is more or less one of incentive and tradition and social conformity looked at impartially. In todays day and age looking at if someone is married as an indication of their fitness to raise children seems obsolete. A relationship will do.
     
  18. Jan 30, 2009 #17

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I'm just curious about whether the father(s) are supporting the woman and children.


    I knew a woman who was one of three sisters, each of whom had a different father. None of the women knew who the father was. The mom just got pregnant and had the girls. The mother finally married, but from what I learned, the girls had a pretty rough time, and the woman I knew ran away from home at 16 and lived on the streets (sleeping in the yards of friends or neighbors). She finally settled down at 18, got her GED, and settled for menial or clerical jobs.

    I'm just puzzled why a woman needs to take fertility treatment after having 6 kids, and what happened to the father(s).
     
  19. Jan 30, 2009 #18

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The fathers may have been a sperm bank.
     
  20. Jan 30, 2009 #19

    LowlyPion

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    This is where I think it gets murky as to who would reasonably have assisted in such "treatment"? With 6 already on the shop floor being processed toward adulthood, another round of fertility encouragement seems like an extraordinary lapse in professional judgment, ... if a professional was involved.

    I'd think if a doctor knowingly engaged in such treatments that he would begin to assume liability for his poor judgment.

    There has to be an adult somewhere in this process.
     
  21. Jan 30, 2009 #20
    I could see that. Apart from overseas pharmacies, Clomid and a few other fertility drugs are also abused by bodybuilders, which there is a huge black market for.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: 8 + 6 How many is too many?
  1. Shenzhou 6! (Replies: 9)

  2. Tomorrow is 6/6/06 (Replies: 27)

  3. 6 Differences (Replies: 1)

  4. 6 questions (Replies: 17)

Loading...