Say we have a point mass [tex]M[/tex] traveling to the right at velocity [tex]V[/tex]. It strikes a dumbell composed of two masses of [tex]M/2[/tex] separated by a massless rod of length [tex]L[/tex]. The collision is elastic.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am having some trouble thinking about this...

After the collision, the original mass is stationary because the dumbell has the same mass, so that ends up going at [tex]V[/tex] towards the right.

However, it also starts spinning, and has a certain kinetic energy. But if the dumbell is moving to the right at [tex]V[/tex], it would have the same translational kinetic energy as the original mass. So the rotational kinetic energy would be extra, and therefor something has gone horribly wrong in my analysis.

Is my assumption that the original mass stop moving incorrect? This holds true for regular, point masses colliding(ie. billiards balls), but I guess it wouldn't be for systems with rotational parts. Because to have an elastic collision means only to have kinetic energy conserved, I suppose that the original mass retains some of its momentum to the right, and gives the dumbell some, and I have to solve for the velocities/angular velocities such that the total energy in the system is conserved. Is this the right analysis of the system?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A collision

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**