Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A few questions on manifolds.

  1. Jun 9, 2008 #1
    In the attached pdf file i have a few questions on manifolds, I hope you can be of aid.
    I need help on question 1,2,6,7.
    here's what I think of them:
    a) the definition of a smooth manifold is that for every point in M we may find a neighbourhood W in R^k of it which the intersection W with M is diffeomorphic to an open neighbourhood U in R^m.
    Now if we take a connected component of M, say V, if it intersects W then the restricition of the above diffeomorphism will do.
    what do you think of this?
    b) I don't think it's irrelevant that M is even a manifold, cause if M is compact and its connected components are disjoint subsets which are connected which their union is M, then obviously if we take some open covering of M then by compactness there's a finite covering of M, this also covers each of its componets, or we may assume that each component has some covering and unite them, it's obviously a covering of M and thus by compactness have a finite covering.

    2.I think we need to show this inductively, or better way, if we define
    M=U(MnW_i) where the union runs through i, MnW_j is the intersection of M with W_j, such MnW_j is diffeomorphic to some open neighbourhood in R^m.
    now we may increase the W_j as big as we please, and thus get increasing sets and if we take the closures of W_j's then those still cover M and are compact in M.
    not sure if that will work though.

    on questions 6 and 7 I'll ask later perhaps tommorrow or the day after that.

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 13, 2008 #2
    1 a) Your answer sounds reasonable, but you haven't justified WHY when you restrict the diffeomorphism on the entire manifold to a connected component it forms a diffeomorphism on the connected component.
    1 b) Sounds good.

    2. I'm pretty sure you can't use induction here (prove me wrong if you can). Why can you increase W_j as big as you please? If this were the case you could cover any compact manifold with a single chart. Is this true?
    (Hint: Think about circles)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: A few questions on manifolds.
  1. Manifold question? (Replies: 8)

  2. Two manifold questions (Replies: 8)

  3. Manifold Question (Replies: 24)

  4. Manifold Questions (Replies: 25)