Which Answer is Not Needed to Determine the Exact Order of These Stones?

  • Thread starter some_one
  • Start date
In summary, the two big stones are not close to each other, and the order of the stones can be determined using only clues 1, 3, and 4.
  • #1
some_one
79
1
on a table we arrange in a line four stones.
two of them are small
two of them are large
two of them are green
two of them are purple

which one of the answers are not needed in order to determine the exact order of this stones?

1.each green stone stayes between a big stone and a small stone
2.both of the big stones are close one to the another
3.the stone on the right edge is purple
4.the green stones have the same size

i don't know where to start
how to deside what answer to start with??
i don't know how to find this answer
??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
some_one said:
on a table we arrange in a line four stones.
two of them are small
two of them are large
two of them are green
two of them are purple

which one of the answers are not needed in order to determine the exact order of this stones?

1.each green stone stayes between a big stone and a small stone
2.both of the big stones are close one to the another
3.the stone on the right edge is purple
4.the green stones have the same size

1st, try and figure out what the order is by looking at all the clues:

1. "each green stone stayes between a big stone and a small stone"
Well, #1 tells you quite a bit. Each green stone is between two stones, one big, one small. Hence, you can conclude that:
A) neither green stone is on an end
B) both green stones are in the middle
C) because the stones are either green or purple, the stones on the ends are necessarily purple. So it goes Purple, Green, Green, Purple.
D) the 1st and 3rd cannot both match in size
E) the 2nd and 4th cannot both match in size
F) The order is necessarily one of:
- Big, Big, Small, Small
- Big, Small, Small, Big
- Small, Big, Big, Small
- Small, Small, Big, Big

That one clue told us a LOT.

2. "both of the big stones are close one to the another"
This tells us that the order is one of:
- Big, Big, Small, Small
- Small, Big, Big, Small
- Small, Small, Big, Big

3. "the stone on the right edge is purple"
This tells us nothing new. Already, we know that this is the useless piece of information. All it tells us is that the order is one of:
- Green, Green, Purple, Purple
- Green, Purple, Green, Purple
- Purple, Green, Green, Purple

But we already know the EXACT order of the colors thanks to #1. Hence, without even looking at the rest of the clues, we know the answer is #3, because #3 told us only a small chunk of what #1 already told us. So any conclusion we can make with #3 could be equally made with #1, therefore #3 is extraneous. But we can keep going anyway.

4. "the green stones have the same size"
That's helpful. It doesn't tell us anything directly about the order, but with #1 and #3, it tells us exactly what we needed to know.

All together
With #1, we know the Color order is:
Purple, Green, Green, Purple
And we know the size order is one of:

I. Big, Big, Small, Small
II. Big, Small, Small, Big
III. Small, Big, Big, Small
IV. Small, Small, Big, Big

So, after clue #1, all that remains is to figure out which order the sizes are in. With clue #2, we can eliminate possibility II, because the big stones must be close to each other. The remaining options are:
I. Big, Big, Small, Small
III. Small, Big, Big, Small
IV. Small, Small, Big, Big

With clue #4 (clue #3 tells us nothing new), we know that since the green's must have the same size, therefore the two in the middle must have the same size, hence eliminating possibilities I and IV. So the only remaining possibility is:
III. Small, Big, Big, Small

Clearly, because #3 told us something that we already learned from #1, #3 is a correct answer to the question. However, the question is (in our due diligence) whether #1 is necessary?

Suppose we didn't have clue #1. We would know:
2.both of the big stones are close one to the another
3.the stone on the right edge is purple
4.the green stones have the same size

So we'd know the size order is one of:
- Big, Big, Small, Small
- Small, Big, Big, Small
- Small, Small, Big, Big

And we'd know the color order could be:
- Green, Green, Purple, Purple
- Purple, Green, Green, Purple

But we wouldn't know which of those would be correct. Hence, #1 is clearly necessary (as it should be, since it told us a LOT of information).

DaveE
 
Last edited:
  • #3
ye but we you also could say that the second answer comes from the first
answer
because one of the conclusions that comes from the first answer is that the first and third rocks differ in size
and so does the 2nd and 4th.

in the second answer we get the same conclusion
so the 2nd one is unnecessary
where is my mistake?
 
  • #4
i havnt bothered to work it out but if you don't know where to start
to answer you question:

leave out clue no.1
can you solve with only clues 2,3,4

if not then
leave out clue no.2
can you solve with only clues 1,3,4

if not then
leave out clue no.3
can you solve with only clues 1,2,4
etc etc

eventually you'll find that you don't need one of the clues
 
  • #5
Are you sure this is not a homework in axiomatics?
 
  • #6
some_one said:
ye but we you also could say that the second answer comes from the first answer because one of the conclusions that comes from the first answer is that the first and third rocks differ in size and so does the 2nd and 4th.

Close, but not quite.

You're correct that the 1st and 3rd differ in size, and the 2nd and 4th differ in size, BUT that doesn't necessarily mean that the big stones are close together. Using only clue #1, a potential arrangement would be:

Big, Small, Small, Big

1st and 3rd differ in size (Big/Small), and 2nd and 4th differ in size (Small/Big), so it's totally valid, even though the two "Big" stones are as far apart as possible.

DaveE
 
  • #7
thanks
i understand your solution
 
  • #8
i don't know if this is axiomatics
but i need to learn solving this kind of questions
for "asat" exam in my country
 

What is the purpose of determining the exact order of the stones?

The purpose of determining the exact order of the stones is usually for research or archaeological purposes. It can also help in understanding the history or significance of the stones.

What factors are needed to determine the exact order of the stones?

The factors needed to determine the exact order of the stones may include the location and context of the stones, the geological composition, and potential tools or methods used to create them.

Why is one answer not needed to determine the exact order of the stones?

One answer may not be needed because there could be multiple factors and variables that contribute to the exact order of the stones. Additionally, one answer may not have a significant impact on the overall determination.

Can technology be used to determine the exact order of the stones?

Yes, technology such as radiocarbon dating, laser scanning, and 3D modeling can be used to assist in determining the exact order of the stones.

Is the exact order of the stones always important?

The exact order of the stones may not always be important, as it depends on the context and purpose of the research. In some cases, a general understanding of the stone arrangement may be sufficient.

Similar threads

  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
525
Replies
6
Views
512
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
24
Views
616
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
18
Views
522
  • General Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top