Hey, in my Schaum' Outline Calculus it says D(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); _{x}(e^{x}) = e^{x}

Let y = e^{x}. Then ln(y) = x. By implicit differentiation, [tex]\frac{1}{y}[/tex]y' = 1

therefor y' = y = e^{x}

For a more rigorous argument, let f(x) = ln(x) and f^{-1}(y) = e^{y}.

Note that f'(x) = [tex]\frac{1}{x}[/tex]. By Theorem 10.2(b).

(f^{-1})'(y) = [tex]\frac{1}{f'(f**-1(y))}[/tex],

That is D_{y}= [tex]\frac{1}{1/e**y}[/tex] = e^{y}

10.2(b): Let f be one-to-one and continuous on the interval (a,b) Then:

If f'x(x_{0}is differentiable and f'(x_{0}) != 0, then f^{-1}is

differentiable at y_{0}= f(x_{0}) and (f^{-1})'(y_{0})

= [tex]\frac{1}{f'(x0}[/tex]

Now, my question is what does "more rigorous argument" mean and what makes the second one more rigorous.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A more rigorous argument

Loading...

Similar Threads for more rigorous argument | Date |
---|---|

I Rigorously understanding chain rule for sum of functions | Aug 6, 2017 |

Is the Hessian Matrix anything more than a mnemonic? | Sep 6, 2014 |

Vector circulation. Stokes, Gauss and maybe more? | Apr 9, 2014 |

More general formula for integrals | Feb 9, 2013 |

Partition Point (and more) | Jan 13, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**