Hey, in my Schaum' Outline Calculus it says D(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); _{x}(e^{x}) = e^{x}

Let y = e^{x}. Then ln(y) = x. By implicit differentiation, [tex]\frac{1}{y}[/tex]y' = 1

therefor y' = y = e^{x}

For a more rigorous argument, let f(x) = ln(x) and f^{-1}(y) = e^{y}.

Note that f'(x) = [tex]\frac{1}{x}[/tex]. By Theorem 10.2(b).

(f^{-1})'(y) = [tex]\frac{1}{f'(f**-1(y))}[/tex],

That is D_{y}= [tex]\frac{1}{1/e**y}[/tex] = e^{y}

10.2(b): Let f be one-to-one and continuous on the interval (a,b) Then:

If f'x(x_{0}is differentiable and f'(x_{0}) != 0, then f^{-1}is

differentiable at y_{0}= f(x_{0}) and (f^{-1})'(y_{0})

= [tex]\frac{1}{f'(x0}[/tex]

Now, my question is what does "more rigorous argument" mean and what makes the second one more rigorous.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A more rigorous argument

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**