A more rigorous argument

  • Thread starter MaxManus
  • Start date
  • #1
277
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hey, in my Schaum' Outline Calculus it says Dx(ex) = ex
Let y = ex. Then ln(y) = x. By implicit differentiation, [tex]\frac{1}{y}[/tex]y' = 1
therefor y' = y = ex


For a more rigorous argument, let f(x) = ln(x) and f-1(y) = ey.
Note that f'(x) = [tex]\frac{1}{x}[/tex]. By Theorem 10.2(b).

(f-1)'(y) = [tex]\frac{1}{f'(f**-1(y))}[/tex],

That is Dy = [tex]\frac{1}{1/e**y}[/tex] = ey

10.2(b): Let f be one-to-one and continuous on the interval (a,b) Then:
If f'x(x0 is differentiable and f'(x0) != 0, then f-1 is
differentiable at y0 = f(x0) and (f-1)'(y0)
= [tex]\frac{1}{f'(x0}[/tex]

Now, my question is what does "more rigorous argument" mean and what makes the second one more rigorous.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,777
911
The first argument uses the fact (your "10.2(b)") that if y= f(x) and x= f-1(y) then
[tex]\frac{dx}{dy}= \frac{1}{\frac{dy}{dx}}[/tex]
The second argument proves that is true for this particular function, as part of the proof.
 
  • #3
277
0
Thanks
 

Related Threads for: A more rigorous argument

  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
9K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
16K
Top