A New Naturalist Philosophy On the Rise

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Doc Al
Mentor
44,987
1,259
Originally posted by Carlos Hernandez
http://www.the-brights.net/
A not-so-bright idea. I'm a huge fan of Dawkins, but this is just silly.

See http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/dowret_24_1.htm [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
237
0
That's.... stupid.
 
  • #4
87
0
The use of the word "Bright" has been discussed to death on the JREF boards...

While my pattern of thinking is a definition of a "Bright", I wont be adopting the title. Too elitist in my opinion, I'm happy being an Evil Atheist...
 
  • #5
Doc Al
Mentor
44,987
1,259
Originally posted by Yahweh
...I'm happy being an Evil Atheist...
Me too! :smile:
 
  • #6
146
0
I am an evil atheist too!

However...

The idea of a god may be lunacy but it is not impossible. Whether I am evil or not is unknown as I we all strive to gain pleasure and evade pain, therefore all action are evil and good or neither. So we can assume that the definitions for good and evil are not abstract enough to be considerred viable for usage.

Therefore,

I am an agnostic-atheist. Though nothing is for certain, even this statement. So I may not be, though due to the lack of evidence to suggest otherwise, other than the fact that people can lie and I may being here and amongst other relevant scenarios, to believe otherwise is lunacy.

:smile:
 
  • #7
146
0
other than the fact that I may be lying and possible other relevant scenarios**
 

Related Threads on A New Naturalist Philosophy On the Rise

Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
14K
Top