# A new T.o.E. I have to start a new thread. The other one's messy.

1. Mar 13, 2004

### b11ngoo

http://img28.photobucket.com/albums/v83/cjsKtU/b11ngoo.jpg [Broken]

Postulate is 1/2.

The theorems are not set. You do that.

Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
2. Mar 17, 2004

### b11ngoo

I didn't set the theorems. From studying this picture the postulate is 1/2.

I hope that mathematicians will make theorems and so doing learn the formula.

3. Mar 17, 2004

### Michael D. Sewell

4. Mar 17, 2004

### Guybrush Threepwood

so where's the TOE?

5. Mar 17, 2004

### b11ngoo

I made a picture that contains my TOE.

I decided that since my description fell short of helping anyone. I would give the core structure material out and see what happens. I don't have a definate postulate or theorem. I gave up on it basically. Nobody cared when I was interested, well I don't care for the TOE anymore. But I recognize others do indeed care so I'm giving my TOE picture out.

I remember a circle shape holding mathematical value. I don't remember the name of that circle shape. But, seeing that's getting studied I put my shape out there too.

Last edited: Mar 17, 2004
6. Mar 17, 2004

### Guybrush Threepwood

doesn't TOE means Theory Of Everything?
maybe I got the initials mixed up.....

7. Mar 17, 2004

### b11ngoo

Yes TOE means Theory Of Everything.

My Picture adequately describes a TOE.

Honestly. On a real level. I doubt anybody can even get a postulate of a TOE even if they see what it looks like. No disrespect, just my evaluation of Mathematicians and Scientists in General.

I do not volunteer doing something like give a postulate or theorem if nobody even tries if I do.

This is just a what if, my putting the TOE here in a picture. And nobody even tries to see if it is a TOE. Everybody just wants to see what work I do so it can be ignored. Well I'll let you or somebody else do the postulating and theorems.

Peace.

8. Mar 17, 2004

### GRQC

If you let us smoke some of what you have and then look at the picture, maybe we'll see the TOE too (or at least Jesus riding a purple elephant)....

9. Mar 18, 2004

### Guybrush Threepwood

well I tried. I look at your picture really hard but I still didn't undersood why my wife tries all the time to match her shoes with her purse.
so if you could comment on your TOE to include that.....

10. Mar 18, 2004

### Michael D. Sewell

I see it. It's.......42!

11. Mar 18, 2004

### b11ngoo

b11ngoo's TOE.

http://img28.photobucket.com/albums/v83/cjsKtU/b11ngoo.jpg [Broken]

My postulate.
(1.)X2/(T)X2+(-1.)X2/(T)X2=1/2 . 2

The number .5 is the point outside the complementary angle. As a dimension outside the complentary angle it equals one dimension. Also it adds a point outside the tripod/complementary angle, and so doing equals the four points on the square, the number of points.

The intersection/geometry follows the four points on the square/one dimension. The number .5 intersects the one dimension LINE, from the 4 point square.
The result of this is 2 dimensions.

The 2 dimensions are shown by the 1 line segment. So 1 Dimension equals 2 dimensions, because it came from the four points which equal 1 dimension. When you look at the 2 D line it forms a triangle shape. And by looking at it you form a 3D effect between the screen and your eyes.

Now the point on the 1 dimension opposite the 2 dimension, on the square. Is a electron. This forms time on the 3 dimensions. Why ? It hasn't moved off the 1 dimension yet, but will.

Now the electron moves through the intersecting/geometric 2nd dimension. corresponding to Superconductivities electron moving through the lattice creating a coulomb force. The result is .5 outside the corresponding angle/tripod/4 dimensions. A supplementary angle.

Now I have described superconductivity. What else can you see ? How about 'Geometry'. I can't see the reason for infinit space or string theory. Because geometry is formed with only 4 dimensions.

Notice how 1 dimension was a supplementary angle line outside the complementary angle of the 4 dimensions.
Then the second angle was from the 4 point square.
Then there was a tripod.
Then there was a 4th dimension from the electron.
Then the first dimension was made by the coulomb force disturbing the 4 dimensions.
There is beauty in 4 dimensions, and the 1 dimension is made by a disturbance caused by the coulomb force. So it can mirror beauty and disturbance.

Peace.

Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
12. Mar 18, 2004

### Michael D. Sewell

Yes, beauty and disturbance. Now I see.