to publish it because i,m not a famous teacher,mathematician from a snob and pedant univesity of Usa of England...this is the way science improves..only by publishing works from famous mathematician.. o fcourse if i were Louis de Branges or Alain Connes or other famous mathematician the work would have been published long ago...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

the link to my webpage is www.geocities.com/josegarc2002/RHypothesis.pdf

remember that the zeta fucntion [tex]\zeta(a+is)[/tex] for every a has no pure imaginary roots (only the trivial roms are purely imaginary, but these do not satisfy that if s is a root also s* is a root).

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A proof of Riemann hypothesis (but of course the snobbish journals don,t want

Loading...

Similar Threads for proof Riemann hypothesis | Date |
---|---|

The clue to the proof of Riemann hypothesis | Jan 25, 2011 |

Very simple (Dis)proof of Riemann hypothesis, Goldbach, Polignac, Legendre conjecture | Aug 19, 2010 |

Simple Proof of Riemann's Hypothesis | May 18, 2010 |

Accurate Proof and varification for Riemann Hypothesis | Jul 5, 2009 |

Sequel for my proof for Riemann's hypothesis | Jul 5, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**