Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A puzzle of two scalar dynamics

  1. Sep 8, 2011 #1
    I have a puzzle when I study the hybrid inflation model.

    Suppose we have two scalar fields, [itex]\phi_1 and \phi_2[/itex]
    first, lets consider the situation where they are in their independent potentials
    [itex]V(\phi_i)=m_i^2\phi_i^2, i = 1,2[/itex]
    with initial value
    [itex]\phi_i^{ini}[/itex]
    We can solve the scalar dynamic equations for them. And they are both in harmonic oscillation. This is Okay.

    But when a 'mixing term' [itex]\lambda^2 \phi_1\phi_2[/itex] is introduced, [itex]\phi_1[/itex] and [itex]\phi_2[/itex] get infinite values, if \lambda is large. This can be showed numerically. What I thought is the large mixing term would lead to [itex]\phi_1 = \phi_2[/itex]. So why it goes to infinite?

    And we can rotate [itex]\phi_1[/itex] and [itex]\phi_2[/itex] to a basis where there is no mixing term. In this basis, we would not get infinite values for [itex]\phi_1[/itex] or [itex]\phi_2[/itex]. So it seems I get a different result working in different basis. What is the problem
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 8, 2011 #2

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You are confusing scalar quantities with vector quantities.
     
  4. Sep 9, 2011 #3

    Chalnoth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    How large are we talking? I don't think you can go above [itex]\lambda^2 = m_1^2 + m_2^2[/itex] and have sensible results.
     
  5. Sep 14, 2011 #4
    do you mean scalars can not mix? I thought about that. But my understanding is two fields can mix if they have exactly the same quantum number.
     
  6. Sep 14, 2011 #5
    The limit sounds reasonable. But why do we have this limit? Unfortunately, I am consider some process which can go beyond this limit (for example, a fast scattering between the two scalars, bringing the two fields to equilibrium.)
     
  7. Sep 14, 2011 #6

    Chalnoth

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Well, one way to think about this is that the fundamental particles are different from the particles we observe, and that the fundamental particles are mixed, through virtue of some matrix, into the particles we observe. This mixing matrix gives rise to the cross-term interaction.

    If your cross term is zero, then the mixing matrix is diagonal, and the particles we observe are the fundamental particles. If, however, the mixing term is at the limit [itex]\lambda^2 = m_1^2 + m_2^2[/itex], then the mixing matrix is saying that there are is in actuality only one fundamental particle that is mixed into these two, and the behavior of the system is fully-specified by the behavior of one of the particles. If you try to get larger off-diagonal terms, the mixing matrix ceases to make any sort of physical sense.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: A puzzle of two scalar dynamics
  1. Why always scalars? (Replies: 3)

Loading...