Hawking's path integral methods seem to rely on the assumption that superpositions of different metrics are meaningful. (If I'm wrong about this, let me know). But are they? Aren't these superpositions destroyed by decoherence. And aren't they also in contradiction with Penrose's claim that there is no well-defined time evolution operator on a superposition of two spacetimes, and that such superpositions should therefore be highly unstable?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A question about Hawking's path integral methods

Loading...

Similar Threads - question Hawking's path | Date |
---|---|

I Questions regarding Hawking radiation | Dec 30, 2016 |

I Question about Hawking radiation | Aug 15, 2016 |

Question about relativistic quantum hawking radiation. | Dec 16, 2013 |

Question about Hawking paradox. | Oct 31, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**