A question on enantiomeric excess

  • Thread starter Thread starter biochemist
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 8K views
biochemist
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Why does a racemic mixture of 98:2 enantiomers consist of one enantiomer in 96% over the other? I'm still not clear about this after reading textbooks. And how about the other one? does it have a negative percentage value of enantiomeric excess?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
ee = %(+) - %(-) assuming the (+) enantiomer is predominant.

also, there is no excess of the (-) enantiomer because there is only an excess of the (+) enantiomer (see the assumption above).

just think of it as if the lesser enantiomer shades out an equal percentage of the predominant enantiomer. so if you have 98%(+) and 2%(-), 2%(-) will shade out 2%(+) and you're left with 96%(+) pure enantiomer. i don't know if that makes sense, but i hope it helps :smile:.