Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A question on square residue.

  1. Jul 16, 2011 #1

    MathematicalPhysicist

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I forgot why the next statement is true and it's bugging me endlessly...

    If p is prime such that p =1 mod 4 then (-1) = x^2 mod p.

    Now in Ashe's Algebriac Number theory notes (book?), he says that
    [tex]((\frac{p-1}{2})!)^2= -1 mod p[/tex]

    I am quite stumped as how to show this, he argues we just need to look at:
    1*2*....((p-1)/2)*(-1)*(-2)....*(-(p-1)/2)

    which on the one hand because p =1 mod 4 it equals [tex]((\frac{p-1}{2})!)^2 [/tex]
    on the other hand it also equals (p-1)!, but why does this equal -1?

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 19, 2011 #2
    x2modp is not -1 for all x. Examples of exceptions include p=13, x=4; p=13 x=2; p=101, x=5...
     
  4. Jul 19, 2011 #3

    disregardthat

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    cubzar, what he meant was that there is a solution to x^2 = -1 mod p.

    It's because (p-1)! = -1 mod p for all prime p. I believe this is called wilsons theorem. The reasons why this is true is that 1,2,3,...,p-1 are all residue classes mod p, so for each number in the product, its inverse is also a factor for all numbers which are not their own inverse. These are 1 and -1 = p-1, so we can ignore them and pair up the others. Thus 2*3*...*(p-2) = 1, and so (p-1)! = -1.
     
  5. Jul 20, 2011 #4

    MathematicalPhysicist

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Ok, thanks, now I do get it.
    in 2*3*...*(p-2) we have a number and its inverse multiplied together, this is why it equals 1.

    I don't understand how I didn't notice this triviality, I guess the age does it trick... :-(
     
  6. Jul 23, 2011 #5
    I don't think it is your fault, the author should have explained it instead of showing off. This is the problem with mathematicians, they write books as incomplete instruction manuals and expect the reader to fill in the gaps.
    :smile:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook