# A question on Weinberg's QFT.

#### ndung200790

The footnote at &7.6 page 329 writes:
'' Recall that by canonical transformation, we mean a transformation from a set of phase space coordinates $\Psi$$^{a}$,$\Pi$$_{a}$ to some other phase space $\tilde{\Psi}$$^{a}$,$\tilde{\Pi}$$_{a}$ such that
[$\tilde{\Psi}$$^{a}$,$\tilde{\Pi}$$_{b}$]$_{P}$=$\delta$$^{a}_{b}$ and [$\tilde{\Psi}$$^{a}$,$\tilde{\Psi}$$^{b}$]$_{P}$=[$\tilde{\Pi}$$_{a}$,$\tilde{\Pi}$$_{b}$]$_{P}$=0.It follows that the
Poisson brackets for any functions A,B are the same whether calculated interms of ψ,∏ or in terms
of $\tilde{\Psi}$ and $\tilde{\Pi}$.It also follows that the Hamintonian equation of motions are the same for ψ,∏ before and after being transformed.
The Lagrangian is changed by canonical transformation,but only by a time-derivative,which does not affect the action.''
To calculate the action we must to time integrate the Lagrangian,but by the transformation the Lagrangian changed by time derivative of a function of field(?),so the action changed by the function being calculated at infinite past and future.Then why we know field vanish at infinite time?

Related Quantum Physics News on Phys.org

#### andrien

So far it is an assumption that in infinite past or future,the fields will not give any contribution.As far as why the lagrangian changes by a time derivative,you can show in a simple way that for the hamiltonian eqn. of motion to be same after canonical transformation the lagrangian can change only by a time derivative.So far however it is a restricted version.

### Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving