1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A sequence is Cauchy?

  1. Mar 2, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    What does it mean when a sequence is Cauchy?
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 2, 2009 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    A sequence of real numbers is a "Cauchy sequence" if and only if |an- am| goes to 0 as m and n go to infinity independently: given [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex] there exist N such that if m and n are both > N, then [itex]|a_n- a_m|< \epsilon[/itex].

    The advantage of working with Cauchy sequences is that (1) even if our sequence is of points in some abstract space, the "distance between points", here |p- q|, is a real number so we are now working with sequences of real numbers and (2) we know what we want the sequence to converge to.

    Of course, for that to be useful, we have to know that the "Cauchy Criterion", that every Cauchy sequence converges, holds in our space- that our space is complete. That has to be proven separately. For exampe the set of real numbers is complete but the set of rational numbers is not. The sequence 3, 3.14, 3.141, 3.1415, 3.14159, ..., where each number contains one more digit in the decimal expansion of [itex]\pi[/itex] is a sequence of rational numbers (each number is a terminating decimal) and a Cauchy sequence (if m,n> N, am and an are identical for at least the first N decimal places so |am- an|< 10-N which goes to 0 as N goes to infinity) but does not converge to any rational number.
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2009
  4. Mar 2, 2009 #3
    So Cauchy sequence occurs when
    If [tex]\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N, m > N[/tex] and [tex]n > N[/tex], then
    [tex] |a_{n} - a_{m}| < \epsilon.[/tex]
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2009
  5. Mar 2, 2009 #4


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I think you meant as m and n go to infinity.
  6. Mar 2, 2009 #5
    Halls, I think you mean |a_n - a_m| < epsilon
  7. Mar 3, 2009 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes, of course. I'll go back and edit so I can pretend I never made those mistakes!
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: A sequence is Cauchy?
  1. Cauchys identity (Replies: 1)

  2. Sequence question (Replies: 4)

  3. Sequence Problem (Replies: 1)

  4. Sequence problem (Replies: 11)

  5. Sequence problem (Replies: 10)