When I started to learn special relativity I knew that in a given inertial reference frame I the mass m, the speed u and the momentum p of a given particle are related by(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

p=mu (1)

Special relativity tought me that in an inertial reference frame I' which moves with speed V relative to I in the positive direction of the overlapped axes OX(O'X') (1) should read

p'=m'u'. (2)

Less or more complicated derivations lead to the following transformation equations for momentum and mass (g(V)=1/sqrt(1-V^2/c^2)

p=g(V)p'(1+V/u') (3)

m=g(V)m'(1+Vu'/c^2) (4)

"Old fashioned" physicists say that (4) relates the "relativistic mass" m and the "relativistic mass m') of the same particle measured by observers from I and I' respectively. If the particle is at rest in I' (u'=0) observers of that frame measure its "rest mass m(0) and (4) leads to

m=g(V)m(0) (5)

Taking into account that c has the same magnitude in all inertial reference frames in relative motion, all transformation equations remain "relativistically correct" if we multiply both their sides by a power of c. Doing so with (4) we obtain nothing interesting because mc and m'c have no physical meaning (no tardyon can move with speed c). Multiplying both sides 0f (4) with c^2 leads to E=mc^2 and E'=m'c^2 respectively which has the physical dimensions of energy (4) becoming

E=g(V)E'(1+Vu'/c^2)=g(V)(E'+Vp') (6)

(3) becoming

p=g(V)(p'+VE'/c^2). (7)

Equation (5) leads to

E=g(V)E(0) (8) E(0) representing the rest energy.

Presenting the transformation equations as (6), (7) and(8) the "new generation" of relativists have nothing to comment.

Is the dispute between the generations solved? Are the frenzied debates motivated?

soft words and hard arguments please

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A short relativistic story but what is its moral?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - short relativistic story | Date |
---|---|

I A question about the relativistic energy dispersion relation | Feb 20, 2018 |

Insights A Short Proof of Birkhoff's Theorem - Comments | Aug 18, 2015 |

A Short Proof of Birkhoff's Theorem | Aug 28, 2014 |

Short question about length contraction | Aug 15, 2014 |

Too Simple & Short Solution of Twin Paradox | Mar 17, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**