Understanding Time Dilation and Its Implications for Time Travel

In summary: Which is a deep and I have no answer to. I think you were saying that by your definition of time, nothing had changed, even though you were moving. That is a fair point, but I think it is best to define time in terms of physical things like aging, breathing, etc. Because by your definition, time is not different for the two people in different reference frames, but by my definition it is. I think that is just an issue of semantics.In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of time dilation in relation to traveling at high speeds. The speaker brings up doubts about whether time dilation is a proven phenomenon or just an instrumental error. The expert clarifies that time dilation has
  • #1
NoDoubt
31
0
Good Afternoon,

After watching a TV program "Into the Universe" "Time Travel " I have some doubts left.

I know Time Dilation has been proven by experiments (Atomic clocks on jet plains) and we see it every day that GPS system needs time correction (Due to Time Dilation perdicted in SR). But the question is, Can this be a instrumental error? Do we need right type of clocks?

I read every where, that to stay younger just hitch a ride on a very fast moving object/train/ship etc.

According to the TV show, if scientists could build a train track around the globe, And that train could travel close to the speed of light. After travling for a week on this train the passangers will travel thousands of years in future. WOW! But I have a problem with this.

Now suppose I am also on this train and the track runs through my city in BC. And I don't have any clock on me to track time, but I will be counting days just by looking at the Sun set when train passes through my city. Now I don't care if someone's wrist watch could not keep up with the time on Earth, because of the fast motion. For me seven days have passed, and the same is true for the people on the Earth. So I did not travel in the future. No Time Dilation.

I don't think running around at the speed of light will make Sun rise/set slower or faster.

Can somebody please explain what I'm missing. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
NoDoubt said:
I know Time Dilation has been proven by experiments (Atomic clocks on jet plains) and we see it every day that GPS system needs time correction (Due to Time Dilation perdicted in SR). But the question is, Can this be a instrumental error? Do we need right type of clocks?
No, it cannot be instrumental error, because its is consistent between many different versions of many different types of instruments and methods of measuring the effects. It is just about as certain as the world being round.

NoDoubt said:
Now suppose I am also on this train and the track runs through my city in BC. And I don't have any clock on me to track time, but I will be counting days just by looking at the Sun set when train passes through my city. Now I don't care if someone's wrist watch could not keep up with the time on Earth, because of the fast motion. For me seven days have passed, and the same is true for the people on the Earth. So I did not travel in the future. No Time Dilation.
Your turning the question into a semantic one, instead of a physical one. If by 'time' you mean the number of sunrises that pass, then no---time is the same in both reference frames. If instead, you mean how much have your cells aged, how much time have you experienced, how many radioactive nuclei will have decayed, how many messages could you have sent to someone, etc etc then the observers experience entirely different amounts of time.

Does that make sense?
 
  • #3
NoDoubt said:
I know Time Dilation has been proven by experiments (Atomic clocks on jet plains) and we see it every day that GPS system needs time correction (Due to Time Dilation perdicted in SR). But the question is, Can this be a instrumental error? Do we need right type of clocks?
We currently know of 4 fundamental forces: electromagnetism, the strong force, the weak force, and gravitation. All 4 of them exhibit time dilation, so no, it is not an instrumental error, it is a symmetry of nature. Unless some new force is found which does not have the same symmetry or unless the symmetry breaks down at some very high energy then time dilation is not a question of bad instrumentation.

NoDoubt said:
For me seven days have passed, and the same is true for the people on the Earth. So I did not travel in the future. No Time Dilation.
This is incorrect, the same is not true for the people on Earth. This exact experiment has been done with muons in a containment ring instead of people on a train.

Btw, sunrise and sunset is a bad method since the sun will rise and set every time you go around the earth. At near light speed the sun will rise and set literally hundreds of times in the blink of an eye.
 
  • #4
zhermes said:
It is just about as certain as the world being round.


True, It appears so.

zhermes said:
If by 'time' you mean the number of sunrises that pass, then no---time is the same in both reference frames.
If time is the same in both reference frames, Then what happened to the Time Dilation?

zhermes said:
If instead, you mean how much have your cells aged, how much time have you experienced, how many radioactive nuclei will have decayed, how many messages could you have sent to someone, etc etc then the observers experience entirely different amounts of time.

Does that make sense?

Sorry I don't undersatand this, So can we say that I will breath less, age less, send less messages in these 12 hrs?

Thanks for your reply.
 
  • #5
NoDoubt said:
zhermes said:
If by 'time' you mean the number of sunrises that pass, then no---time is the same in both reference frames.
If time is the same in both reference frames, Then what happened to the Time Dilation?

Sorry I don't undersatand this, So can we say that I will breath less, age less, send less messages in these 12 hrs?
What we perceive as time IS dilated---it IS different in those two reference frames. Yes, you will breathe less, age less, etc.
But you are correct that you will observe the same number of sunrises/sunsets---but for you those sunrises will occur at a much different rate than the 'stationary' people on earth.

I was trying to say that you were bringing up a question of how we define 'time.'
 
  • #6
DaleSpam said:
We currently know of 4 fundamental forces: electromagnetism, the strong force, the weak force, and gravitation. All 4 of them exhibit time dilation, so no, it is not an instrumental error, it is a symmetry of nature. Unless some new force is found which does not have the same symmetry or unless the symmetry breaks down at some very high energy then time dilation is not a question of bad instrumentation.

This is incorrect, the same is not true for the people on Earth. This exact experiment has been done with muons in a containment ring instead of people on a train.

Let us try this with the Hadron Collider, I'm in the collider spinning at near light speed, And there is a glass window so that I can see the sky and the passage on the Sun, Now according to you, I shall see Sun passing in the sky rapidly?

DaleSpam said:
Btw, sunrise and sunset is a bad method since the sun will rise and set every time you go around the earth. At near light speed the sun will rise and set literally hundreds of times in the blink of an eye.

I know this, but we will stop the train and get off, after seeing seventh sunset in my city,

I think I'm getting what are trying to say, that All of this will happen very fast to the passangers on the train.? So the time dilation is indeed there. Thank you so much for clearing the doubts.
 
  • #7
NoDoubt said:
Let us try this with the Hadron Collider, I'm in the collider spinning at near light speed, And there is a glass window so that I can see the sky and the passage on the Sun, Now according to you, I shall see Sun passing in the sky rapidly?
Yes.

NoDoubt said:
I know this, but we will stop the train and get off, after seeing seventh sunset in my city,

I think I'm getting what are trying to say, that All of this will happen very fast to the passangers on the train.? So the time dilation is indeed there. Thank you so much for clearing the doubts.
Exactly. Although both the train and the city will agree that there were only 7 sunsets in the city from the passengers on the train will have only breathed in and out a couple of times and they will not have gotten hungry during those 7 sunsets in the city, whereas the people in the city will have breathed about 100,000 times and have eaten and slept several times.
 
  • #8
zhermes said:
What we perceive as time IS dilated---it IS different in those two reference frames. Yes, you will breathe less, age less, etc.
But you are correct that you will observe the same number of sunrises/sunsets---but for you those sunrises will occur at a much different rate than the 'stationary' people on earth.

Thank you, Now I understand, how this time dilation works.

zhermes said:
I was trying to say that you were bringing up a question of how we define 'time.'

Defining time is easy, there is no proper time in this universe, because every thing is in motion relative to each other, except in the middle of the universe, where it all began.

Thank you again for your help.
 

1. What is time travel?

Time travel is a theoretical concept that involves moving between different points in time. It is often depicted in science fiction, but is not currently possible with our current understanding of physics.

2. Is time travel possible?

As of now, time travel is not possible with our current understanding and technology. However, some scientists and researchers believe that it may be possible in the future with advancements in technology and physics.

3. How does time travel work?

The concept of time travel is still highly debated and there is no consensus on how it would work. Some theories suggest that it could involve manipulating space-time, while others propose using wormholes or black holes to travel through time.

4. Can time travel change the course of history?

This is another highly debated topic. Some theories suggest that even the slightest change in the past could have major consequences on the present and future. However, there are also theories that propose the concept of a "fixed timeline" where time travel cannot change the course of history.

5. Has anyone successfully time traveled?

There is no concrete evidence or scientific proof that anyone has successfully time traveled. Many claims of time travel have been debunked and there is currently no technology or method that allows for time travel.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
999
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
820
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
394
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
734
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
Back
Top