Exactly! But the problem is to give a precise definition of "fine".To me, it's superdeterminism if the explanation for why something happened can potential involve fine-tuning the initial conditions of the entire universe.
Neither do I. But some think that quantum equilibrium is a conspiracy. Unfortunately, it's impossible to give a rigorous proof that it isn't, because there is no precise definition of conspiracy.Getting back on-topic: There should be a definitive answer, one way or the other, about whether BM requires superdeterminism of the conspiracy kind. I don't see that it does.