A small diamond of mass 10.0 g drops from a swimmer’s earring and falls through the water

annamal
Homework Statement:
A small diamond of mass 10.0 g drops from a swimmer’s earring and falls through the water, reaching a terminal velocity of 2.0 m/s. a) Assuming the frictional force on the diamond obeys what is b? (b) How far does the diamond fall before it reaches 90 percent of its terminal speed?
Relevant Equations:
v_t = terminal velocity
a) -m*g + b*v = m*a = 0 for terminal velocity
b = m*g/v_t
b) My question is here:
0.9v_t = v0 + a*t = a*t
t = 0.9v_t/a
delta_h = v0*t + 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)/a =
where a = (-m*g + b*v)/m
delta_h = (0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)*m)/(-m*g + b*v)
b) My question is here!
0.9v_t = v0 + a*t = a*t
t = 0.9v_t/a
delta_h = v0*t + 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)/a =
where a = (-m*g + b*v)/m
delta_h = (0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)*m)/(-m*g + b*v)

Homework Helper
Gold Member
Could you clarify this part?
"...Assuming the frictional force on the diamond obeys what is b? (b) How far..."

Staff Emeritus
Homework Helper
Gold Member
0.9v_t = v0 + a*t = a*t
This is true if acceleration is constant. Is acceleration constant?

Gold Member
A small diamond of mass 10.0 g
That's a 50 carat diamond! It'd be as big as an acorn!

Delta2, hutchphd, Bystander and 1 other person
Staff Emeritus
Homework Helper
Gold Member
That's a 50 carat diamond! It'd be as big as an acorn!
Good observation. This also brings to mind another point though, the total force is not mg-bv ...

Homework Helper
Gold Member
As an aside, a 10-g diamond is not exactly "small". Considering that there are 5 carats to a gram, a 10-gram diamond would be 50 carats.

"A 50-carat white diamond has fetched 6.5 million Swiss francs (dollars) at a Christie's auction of jewelry, with the auctioneer saying an anonymous trader snapped up the rare stone."
Source: https://www.dailysabah.com/life/2018/05/17/50-carat-diamond-sold-for-65m-at-christies-auction

How stupid can one be to go swimming with of these hanging from one's ear? I believe that physics problems ought to be reasonably realistic.

On edit: I see @DaveC426913 preempted me.

Delta2
annamal
This is true if acceleration is constant. Is acceleration constant?
a = (-m*g + b*v)/m --> acceleration is dependent on velocity. why does acceleration have to be constant?

annamal
Good observation. This also brings to mind another point though, the total force is not mg-bv ...
No, it is. The solution said so.

annamal
Homework Statement:: A small diamond of mass 10.0 g drops from a swimmer’s earring and falls through the water, reaching a terminal velocity of 2.0 m/s. a) Assuming the frictional force on the diamond obeys what is b? (b) How far does the diamond fall before it reaches 90 percent of its terminal speed?
Relevant Equations:: v_t = terminal velocity
a) -m*g + b*v = m*a = 0 for terminal velocity
b = m*g/v_t
b) My question is here:
0.9v_t = v0 + a*t = a*t
t = 0.9v_t/a
delta_h = v0*t + 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)/a =
where a = (-m*g + b*v)/m
delta_h = (0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)*m)/(-m*g + b*v)

b) My question is here!
0.9v_t = v0 + a*t = a*t
t = 0.9v_t/a
delta_h = v0*t + 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*a*t^2 = 0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)/a =
where a = (-m*g + b*v)/m
delta_h = (0.5*((0.9*v_t)^2)*m)/(-m*g + b*v)
Assuming the frictional force on the diamond obeys -bv what is b?

annamal
Could you clarify this part?
"...Assuming the frictional force on the diamond obeys what is b? (b) How far..."
Assuming the frictional force on the diamond obeys -bv what is b?

Lnewqban
Staff Emeritus
Homework Helper
Gold Member
No, it is. The solution said so.
That it is in the solution does not make it correct. In this case, the solution is wrong. It would be correct if the water density was very small compared to the diamond density, but that is not the case. The specific gravity of diamond is ca 3.5, which is not that much larger than 1.
a = (-m*g + b*v)/m --> acceleration is dependent on velocity. why does acceleration have to be constant?
The formula you quoted:
$$v = v_0 + at$$
assumes that ##a## is constant. It is not valid if ##a## is not constant.

annamal
That it is in the solution does not make it correct. In this case, the solution is wrong. It would be correct if the water density was very small compared to the diamond density, but that is not the case. The specific gravity of diamond is ca 3.5, which is not that much larger than 1.

The formula you quoted:
$$v = v_0 + at$$
assumes that ##a## is constant. It is not valid if ##a## is not constant.
Ok, I found the formula v = v0*e^(-bt/m) but I am confused because isn't v0 the initial velocity 0?

Staff Emeritus
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Ok, I found the formula v = v0*e^(-bt/m) but I am confused because isn't v0 the initial velocity 0?
That is the formula without gravitation or buoyancy. It is not applicable here. You can easily see this from the fact that it goes to zero (and not the terminal velocity) as time goes to infinity.

annamal
That is the formula without gravitation or buoyancy. It is not applicable here. You can easily see this from the fact that it goes to zero (and not the terminal velocity) as time goes to infinity.
Late, but to solve part b, I did, ##0.9v = \int_0^t(mg-bv)dt## where b= 0.049, but I don't know how to solve that equation

Homework Helper
Gold Member
2022 Award
Late, but to solve part b, I did, ##0.9v = \int_0^t(mg-bv)dt## where b= 0.049, but I don't know how to solve that equation
You can't solve it in that form because of the unknown function v(t) inside the integral. You need to get all the occurrences of v together.
Taking it back the the differentIal form, ##0.9\dot v = mg-bv##. Now get both v's on the same side. There are two ways to do that. Both work, but the way forward may be more obvious with one than with the other.

Last edited:
annamal
You can't solve it in that form because of the unknown function v(t) inside the integral. You need to get all the occurrences of v together.
Taking it back the the differentIal form, ##0.9\dot v = mg-bv##. Now get both v's on the same side. There are two ways to do that. Both work, but the way forward may be more obvious with one than with the other.
ok, I am rusty with my diff eq, I get ##0.9\frac{dv}{dt} + bv = mg##... and then what?

Staff Emeritus
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Then that is a linear ODE with constant coefficients.

Homework Helper
Gold Member
2022 Award
ok, I am rusty with my diff eq, I get ##0.9\frac{dv}{dt} + bv = mg##... and then what?
Of course, you have picked the harder one. Can you see the other way to get all the v's on the same side?

annamal
Of course, you have picked the harder one. Can you see the other way to get all the v's on the same side?
Oh nvm. I found the derivation in the book and got the correct answer. Thanks anyways.

Homework Helper
Gold Member
2022 Award
Oh nvm. I found the derivation in the book and got the correct answer. Thanks anyways.
Fwiw, the other way is to divide both sides by mg-bv. Then both sides are integrable.

Last edited:
Delta2
Staff Emeritus