# A trick on PDE?

1. Mar 19, 2007

### hanson

A trick on PDE??

Hi all.
I am reading a text in mathematical wave theory.
I saw and am confused by a manipulation of a PDE, as shown in the attached figure.

I don't really undertand how the equation (1.9) is transformed by "introducing the charcteristic variables). (as indicated by the red arrow and the question mark)

I guess there are some missing steps? Could somone fill in the missing links so that I could know what's going on there.

#### Attached Files:

• ###### de.jpg
File size:
36.4 KB
Views:
85
2. Mar 19, 2007

### cristo

Staff Emeritus
New parameters are introduced such that $$\xi=x-t ,\hspace{1cm} \zeta=x+t$$. You need to work out utt and uxx in terms of the new parameters. For example, $$u_t=\frac{\partial u}{\partial \xi}\frac{\partial \xi}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial \zeta}\frac{\partial \zeta}{\partial t}=-u_{\xi}+u_{\zeta}$$, using the chain rule. Use a similar method to find ux, and then to find utt and uxx.

When you've worked out utt and uxx sub them into the LHS of (1.9) and you should obtain the result.

Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
3. Mar 19, 2007

### hanson

Thanks! I think I could work it out.
But what is the motivation of doing this?
I mean, is there any phyical meaning attached? Or What benefits can be obtained after this transformation?

4. Mar 19, 2007

### cristo

Staff Emeritus
I'm not sure of the physical meaning, but the advantage of performing the transformation is that you can integrate the equation! Note that f is now a function of only $\xi$, so the primes denote differentiation wrt $\xi$. Thus you can integrate once wrt $\xi$ and once wrt $\zeta$ and obtain the result given (noting that this is a PDE and so the constant of integration is not just a constant in the normal sense, but is a function of the coordinate not integrated with repect to.)

IF you don't make the substitution, then the equation is a fair bit harder to solve.

5. Mar 19, 2007

### hanson

many thanks! Nice and detailed explanation!

BTW, do you mind answering also my another question on asymptotic expansion?