1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Tricky Problem

  1. Nov 10, 2004 #1
    My friend found this problem from Anton

    Suppose that the auxiliary equation of the equation

    [tex]y'' + py' + qy = 0[/tex]

    has a distinct roots [tex]\mu[/tex] and [tex]m[/tex].

    (a)Show that the function

    [tex]g_\mu(x) = \frac{e^{\mu x} - e^{mx} }{\mu - m}[/tex]

    is a solution of the differential equation

    (b)Use L'Hopital's rule to show that

    [tex]\lim_{\mu\rightarrow\ m} g_\mu(x) = xe^{mx}[/tex]

    I tried to proof this using the D-operator method to find the roots, it doesn't seem to work. There seems to be a simpler way of doing this, but I just can't see it.

    Any help is appreciated.
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 10, 2004 #2
    Ok i havent given this much thought but try this ,
    (Assuming that p and q are constant)
    Standard results of polynomials,
    p = mu + m
    q = mu*m

    Differentiate the function g(x) and substitute in the original equation to show that it satisfies the equation.

    the answer to b is trivial using L'Hospital,
    Differentiate numerator and denominator w.r.t mu,
    its easy to see that numerator differentiates to xe^(mu*x)
    and the denominator is 1.
    the limit evaluates to the required one easily.....

    -- AI
  4. Nov 10, 2004 #3
    actually you dont have to use L'Hopital, just the plain definition of derivative, wich is more elegant i think :P
  5. Nov 10, 2004 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I's definitely more elegant...
    The auxiliary equation reads
    [tex]\lambda^2+p\lambda+q=0 [/tex]
    If u chose the solution with "+" to be"µ",and the one with "-" to be "m",then its solutions verify identically the equation above,i.e.
    [tex] \mu^2+p\miu+q=0;m^2+pm+q=0 [/tex]
    Making the differentiations of "g" correctly and substituting into the original equation,after separating parts with [tex] \exp{\mux} [/tex] and [tex] \exp{mx} [/tex],will find exactly the 2 equations stated above,which actually will ensure you that g is a solution of th equation.
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2004
  6. Nov 10, 2004 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hold your horses for a while,junior...
    1.It's irrelevant "which is which",as long as they are different.
    2.Why would complicate that much???The general solution to the given ODE is a linear superposition of fundamental solutions,which are [tex] \exp{\mux} [/tex] and [tex] \exp{mx} [/tex] with arbitrary (hopefully noninfinite,in this case it applies,sice "µ" and "m"are different) coefficients,call them A and B.Who stops you from chosing
    [tex] A=\frac{1}{\mu-m};B=-A [/tex] or viceversa,to find your solution without making any derivatives of the solution given??????? :eek:
    Bonehead... :rofl: :biggrin:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: A Tricky Problem
  1. Tricky Looking! (Replies: 10)