Consider a flat Robertson-Walker metric.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

When we say that there is a singularity at

$$t=0$$

Clearly it is a coordinate dependent statement. So it is a "candidate" singularity.

In principle there is "another coordinate system" in which the corresponding metric has no singularity as we approach that point in the manifold.

However, we know that Big Bang is "a true" singularity, but how should we test that?

Is it intuitively self-evident, or should we check rigorously all scalars based on the Ricci tensor? If so "which order of scalar" goes to infinity at that point called Big Bang?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A true singularity, coordinate independent, at Big Bang

Loading...

Similar Threads - true singularity coordinate | Date |
---|---|

B Is it true that a rocket at light speed has infinite mass? | Dec 14, 2016 |

I How would the sky look if ether drag hypothesis was true? | Oct 8, 2016 |

I Why isn't spacetime considered as true 4D? | Sep 29, 2016 |

Is Lorentz invariance is true in curved spacetime? | Dec 30, 2015 |

There is only one True Singularity and It is at the Center | Aug 22, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**