What is the best font for displaying mathematical symbols?

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Notation
In summary, the conversation discusses issues with the readability of differential forms due to the use of Times New Roman font. The speaker proposes to use the default font to make the symbols more legible, but the original poster prefers to use Times New Roman. The conversation concludes with the suggestion to continue using the chosen font, while occasionally reposting passages in the default font for the sake of readability. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of finding a balance between readability and personal preferences.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
I have been unable to read the differential forms thread but wanted to, and now I have discovered how to make it legible on my browser. Lethe has been using Times Roman font and for some reason most of the symbols come thru as boxes for me in that font. So as an experiment I have quoted a Lethe post and removed the Font specification, setting that back to default. Most of the symbols now come thru for me altho a couple I see here (& sdot , & nabla ) still do not

I'm wondering if anyone else was discouraged earlier by seeing all those boxes and no being able to tell what symbols they stood for.

Originally posted by lethe in diff forms thread


at this point, i will stop using classical vector notation. i will write the directional derivative as vμ∂μƒ, where ∂μ is shorthand for ∂/∂xμ, and xμ is one of the coordinates, and μ is a number that ranges over the number of dimensions of the manifold, from 0 to n-1 usually. so there will be n different coordinates for an n dimensional manifold. and vμ is going to be associated with the μ-th component of the vector, to be defined. and even though i didn t write it, i meant for that to be a summation: v⋅∇ƒ = ∑ vμ∂μƒ = vμ∂μƒ. i just leave off the ∑ from now on. every time you see an equation with the same letter as a superscript and a subscript, you should sum over that index.

...

we define the vector to be that operator. this is how it operates on a function:
v(ƒ) = vμ∂μƒ                                             (2)
since this is independent of the function that i want to operator on, let me just write the vector operator:
v = vμ∂μ                                             (3)
and this is the point of this post. a tangent vector is defined to be/associated with/thought of as a differential operator. v is the vector, and vμ are the coordinate components of the vector, and ∂μ are the coordinate basis vectors of the tangent space. the vector itself is coordinate independent, but the components are not, ...

OK, it should be easy to show that the set of tangent vectors, thusly defined, satisfy the axioms of the vector space. i will call this vector space TMp. that is, the tangent space to the manifold M at the point p is TMp. for an n dimensional manifold, the tangent space is always an n dimensional vector space.

...

 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
so do you think times new roman is poor choice for font? i chose that because certain symbols, like pi, display poorly in the default font. i also upped the size, which might make a difference.

maybe i should change the font/size?
 
  • #3
Originally posted by lethe
so do you think times new roman is poor choice for font? i chose that because certain symbols, like pi, display poorly in the default font. i also upped the size, which might make a difference.

maybe i should change the font/size?

If I don't change my browser and you don't change your font then when I first open one of your posts I will see a lot of boxes.
This is not the end of the world or even a particularly bad thing.
I can adapt to this situation as I just have in this example by
reposting in the default font!

I am assuming that no one else has the problem I do----everyone else who wants to read the post can do so in your chosen Times New Roman, with things like ∇ and ⋅ (which I will see as boxes).

BTW I also do not like certain features of the default font----the pi does not look pi-like and the theta looks like an ugly number 8.
But nothing is perfect!

Why not carry on, Lethe, with your chosen font and size, and let me cope by reposting certain passages in the default font so that I can read them? A little occasional repetition in another font seems harmless enough. Or?

I like your style of writing---it could be a really useful thread as originally planned---I would say go for it.
If anyone tries to distract you with some kind of compensatory know-it-all syndrome just put them on the ignore list. The original idea is a basic introductory treatment, right?
 

1. What is Lethe's notation?

Lethe's notation is a system of musical notation that was developed by the scientist Lethe in the late 20th century. It is based on the principles of mathematical and scientific notation, and is used to represent complex musical compositions.

2. How is Lethe's notation different from traditional musical notation?

Lethe's notation differs from traditional musical notation in that it uses symbols and mathematical equations to represent musical elements, rather than staff lines and notes. This allows for a more precise and scientific representation of music.

3. Can anyone learn to read and write in Lethe's notation?

Yes, with proper instruction and practice, anyone can learn to read and write in Lethe's notation. It may require some basic understanding of mathematics and musical theory, but it is accessible to anyone who is interested in learning.

4. What are the advantages of using Lethe's notation?

One of the main advantages of Lethe's notation is its ability to accurately represent complex and intricate musical compositions. It also allows for easier transposition and analysis of music, making it a valuable tool for composers and music theorists.

5. Is Lethe's notation widely used in the music industry?

Currently, Lethe's notation is not widely used in the music industry. However, it has gained popularity among some contemporary composers and musicians who are drawn to its precise and scientific approach to music notation.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
124
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
228
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
21
Views
627
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
606
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top