1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Abelian group

  1. Sep 22, 2005 #1
    hi! i am new in abstract algebra.
    how can i prove that a group of order 5 is Abelian?

    thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 22, 2005 #2
    Are you familiar with Lagrange's Theorem?

    Start picking some elements and generating cyclic subgroups, see what happens. What happens with coprime group orders? (say, 6). What happens with prime ordered groups?
     
  4. Sep 22, 2005 #3
    Every group of prime order is cyclic and thus abelian.
     
  5. Sep 24, 2005 #4
    Would you prove it was cyclic by proving the fact that all subgroups generated by an element have the order n/(n,s)=n or 1, where s is the generator and n is the number of elements in the group?
     
  6. Sep 25, 2005 #5
    The fact that its cyclic is trivial. Pick any element s (not the 1). And consider the group that it generates. It has to generate the whole group because otherwise it would generate a subgroup. But the order of a subgroup must divide the order of the group.Since only 1 and p divide p (if p is prime) it must generate the whole group. Thus 1 element generates the whole goup and by defenition this means the group is cyclic.
     
  7. Sep 25, 2005 #6
    "The order of a subgroup must divide the order of the group"--what if one hasn't seen that before, is there an easy proof, besides the psuedo-method i proposed?
     
  8. Sep 25, 2005 #7
    The above is known as Lagrange's theorem. It's fundamental to group theory. When I was studying group theory, I learnt it before I knew the defintion of "cyclic". You really won't be able to go far without the theorem so I suggest you look up the theorem. Any text book on goup theory will have it. The proof is not hard, but envolves the concept of cosets. Have you met that yet??
     
  9. Sep 25, 2005 #8
    No, haven't met cosets. Yet. We're working out of Fraleigh's book, which is an excellent book. I just looked it up, and it's the next section we're doing. We just finished cycles. Can't wait!!!
     
  10. Sep 26, 2005 #9
    Yeah its fun stuff ahead mate!!! Trust me, one you learn Lagrange's theroem, the question you asked will seem really easy to you.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Abelian group
  1. Group Velocity (Replies: 1)

  2. Speed of Group (Replies: 3)

  3. Group velocity (Replies: 2)

Loading...