This question is from K. Huang, Quantum Field Theory: from operators to path integrals.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

He says that, under a continuous infinitesimal transformation,

[itex]\phi[/itex](x)->[itex]\phi[/itex](x)+[itex]\delta\phi[/itex]

the change of the Lagrangian density must be in the from

[itex]\delta[/itex]L=[itex]∂^{\mu}[/itex][itex]W_{\mu}[/itex](x)

It is easily understood that this quantity must be Lorentz-invariant, but why should only be this form, not others (e.g. without derivatives).

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# About Noether's theorem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Noether's theorem | Date |
---|---|

A Time independence of a Noether charge in QFT? | Feb 10, 2018 |

I About Noether Theorem | Dec 13, 2017 |

I Lorentz transformation and its Noether current | Jul 20, 2017 |

A Does an infinitesimal generator of acceleration exist? | Nov 17, 2016 |

Infintesimal transformations and Noether's theorem | May 27, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**