- #1
moses99
- 1
- 0
is there any experiments that prove special relativity wrong
like discovering particles faster than light?
like discovering particles faster than light?
Special relativity applies to spacetimes that are flat and have no gravitational constant.moses99 said:is there any experiments that prove special relativity wrong
like discovering particles faster than light?
As of now, there is no evidence or experiment that has successfully proven special relativity wrong. The theory has been extensively tested and has consistently been shown to accurately describe the behavior of particles and objects in our universe. However, scientists continue to conduct experiments and research to further understand the complexities of the theory and its potential limitations.
Some of the most well-known experiments that have tested special relativity include the Michelson-Morley experiment, the Kennedy-Thorndike experiment, and the Ives-Stilwell experiment. These experiments have all confirmed the predictions of special relativity, such as time dilation and length contraction.
No, there are currently no known particles that violate the principles of special relativity. In fact, many of our modern technologies, such as GPS systems, rely on the accuracy of special relativity in order to function correctly. Any potential violations of the theory would require a significant amount of evidence and research to be accepted in the scientific community.
Special relativity differs from other theories of relativity, such as general relativity, in its scope and focus. Special relativity deals specifically with the behavior of objects and particles moving at constant velocities in the absence of external forces, while general relativity includes the effects of gravity and how it affects the curvature of space and time.
If special relativity was proven wrong, it would be a significant shift in our understanding of the universe and would require a major overhaul of many of our current theories and technologies. However, it is important to note that any new theory that replaces special relativity would also need to account for all the experimental evidence that has supported special relativity thus far.