Is there any particular reason that scalar curvature is defined [tex] R = g^{ab}R_{ab} [/tex] instead of [tex] R = R^{ab}R_{ab} [/tex] ?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Do both scalars share the property that they are zero if and only if every component of [itex] R^{a}_{bcd} [/itex] is also zero?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# About scalar curvature

Loading...

Similar Threads - scalar curvature | Date |
---|---|

I Covariant derivative of Ricci scalar causing me grief! | Nov 26, 2017 |

A On the dependence of the curvature tensor on the metric | Nov 2, 2017 |

I Questions about gradient and scalar product | Aug 15, 2016 |

Curvature of a group manifold | Feb 11, 2016 |

Physical motivation for integrals over scalar field? | Feb 5, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**