• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

About the equipartition theorem

1. Homework Statement

(a) The rotational energy of a diatomic molecule such as [tex]H_{2}[/tex] is given by

[tex]\frac{J^2_{\|}}{2I_{\|}}+\frac{J^2_{\bot}}{2I_{\bot}}[/tex].

[tex]J^2_{\|}[/tex] stands for the angular momentum with respect to the axis of symmetry of the molecule and [tex]J^2_{\bot}[/tex] the angular momentum perpendicular to that axis. If you have a gas with N molecules held at temperature T, what is the mean energy per molecule?

(b) A long thin needle floats within a gas at constant temperature. What will be the mean orientation of the needle's angular momentum vector? Parallel or perpendicular to the axis of symmetry of the needle?

2. Homework Equations

Equipartition theorem

[tex]\left\langle x_i \frac{\partial \mathcal{H}}{\partial x_j}
= kT\delta_{ij} \right\rangle [/tex]

3. The Attempt at a Solution

(a) Because of the equipartition theorem, each degree of freedom gives [tex]\frac{1}{2}kT[/tex] to the energy, so I think the mean energy per molecule should be [tex]\frac{3}{2}kT[/tex] (the free particle contribution) plus [tex]\frac{2}{2}kT[/tex] (the rotational energy).

(b) I think the angular momentum vector will be oriented perpendicular to the axis of symmetry of the needle, but I don't have an argument for it.

Thanks for your attention!
 

Answers and Replies

(a) Each harmonic term in the hamiltonian should give [tex]\frac{1}{2}kT[/tex] to the mean energy per molecule, and then the rotational contribution to the mean energy per molecule should be 3kT.

(b) The needle will rotate about the axis of symmetry of the molecule because the moment of inertia is greater than the moment of inertia about the line that passes trough the atoms.
 
Do you know where I can find information about the ideal diatomic molecule? Thanks a million.
 
249
0
(a) Because of the equipartition theorem, each degree of freedom gives [tex]\frac{1}{2}kT[/tex] to the energy, so I think the mean energy per molecule should be [tex]\frac{3}{2}kT[/tex] (the free particle contribution) plus [tex]\frac{2}{2}kT[/tex] (the rotational energy).
I think that the rotation perpendicular to the axis of simetry would contribute twice as much (2*kT/2), since it has two possible directions. This gives an average of 3kT total (translation+rotation) energy per molecule (if vibration is neglected).
 
I think that the rotation perpendicular to the axis of simetry would contribute twice as much (2*kT/2), since it has two possible directions.
Maybe I'm making a mistake, but one of those 2 directions was already counted when we considered the rotations about the axis of symmetry.

By the way, I've been reading about this problem and found that books say that the diatomic molecule has (5/2)*kT, since they consider only the rotations about the axis of symmetry. Why do they do that?
 
249
0
Maybe I'm making a mistake, but one of those 2 directions was already counted when we considered the rotations about the axis of symmetry.

By the way, I've been reading about this problem and found that books say that the diatomic molecule has (5/2)*kT, since they consider only the rotations about the axis of symmetry. Why do they do that?
Let's say that the centers of H atoms of our molecule lie on x axes (this is the symmetry axes). There are 3 possible rotations: around x, y and z axes. x gives angular momentum parallel to symmetry axes, y and z are two degrees of fredom coresponding to angular momentum perpendicular to axes of symmetry: therefore they get 2*kT/2 and rotation around x gets kT/2, so the total energy is 3 kT (together with translation).

5/2 kT corresponds to translation+2 rotations perpendicular to the axes of symmetry. The rotation around the axes of symmetry is left out.
I think it is because of the discreet values of angular momentum in quantum mechanics (equipartition theorem is true only in classical aproximation, where all values are allowed). The formula for rotational energy is gama^2/2*J. J around the axes of symmetry is very small, so it is possible that even the smalles allowed value of gama gives an energy much higher than kT, so it the probability for rotation around that axes is small and can be neglected (exceptions are very high temperatures).
 

Related Threads for: About the equipartition theorem

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
428
Top