Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A About the least action principle

  1. Apr 20, 2016 #1
    hello, everyone. When a vector field ##A_{\mu}## has the Lagrangian of the form as
    ##L=Const.{\times}F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}##, where
    [itex]F_{\mu\nu}=({\partial}_{\mu}-{\alpha}{\partial}^{\rho}{\partial}_{\rho}{\partial}_{\mu})A_{\nu}-({\partial}_{\nu}-{\alpha}{\partial}^{\rho}{\partial}_{\rho}{\partial}_{\nu})A_{\mu}[/itex]. Now I will apply the least action principle to it. Which one of the following two choices is the right one?
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 21, 2016 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Which do you think and why?
  4. Apr 21, 2016 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    What is that alpha in your field strength? I'd say F=dA.

    You can include higher derivatives in your functional derivative; if you use partial integrations, you'll see that every higher order derivative swaps a sign.
  5. May 16, 2016 #4
    Thanks for your attention. I was reading a paper on a model of generalized uncertainty principle which originated from quantum gravity effect. ##\alpha## represents the parameter of quantum gravity effect.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted