Rubber Sheet Analogy: How Mass Bends Spacetime

In summary, the rubber sheet analogy is not a perfect representation of the curvature of spacetime in General Relativity. It is used as a visualization tool, but it is important to note that the curvature is not in our 3-dimensional space, but in the 4-dimensional spacetime. Additionally, the curvature does not necessarily imply the existence of a higher dimensional space. While it is possible for our universe to be curved in a higher dimension, there is currently no known way to confirm this.
  • #1
Abtinnn
58
7
I have a question on GR.
To what extent is the rubber sheet analogy correct?
To be more specific, in that analogy, an object with mass M bends the 2-D space (the sheet) into a third dimension (the sheet goes downward). Does this imply that in out universe, an object with mass bends the spacetime into another extra dimension? Sorry about the wording of the question...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Is it possible for us to know hyperbolic/Minkowski space looks like?
 
  • #4
You shouldn't take this analogy very seriously. It is just a picture to help you see how curvature can alter the path of an object. There are several areas where the analogy breaks down:

(1) The curvature in GR is not a curvature of our 3-dimensional space. It is a curvature of our 4-dimensional space time. In fact, in the Solar System, for example, almost all of the curvature that causes the motion of the planets is curvature in the time components of the curvature tensor.

(2) It is possible for our 4-dimensional space time to be curved without being embedded in a higher dimensional space. You can't conclude that just because it is curved it must be curved in a higher dimensional space. We just use the curvature of a 2D membrane embedded in 3D space to help us visualize what is happening.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller and Abtinnn
  • #5
Thanks a lot for the responses!

phyzguy said:
(2) It is possible for our 4-dimensional space time to be curved without being embedded in a higher dimensional space. You can't conclude that just because it is curved it must be curved in a higher dimensional space. We just use the curvature of a 2D membrane embedded in 3D space to help us visualize what is happening.

Is there a way for us to find out whether or not our spacetime is curved in a higher dimension?
 
  • #6
Abtinnn said:
Is there a way for us to find out whether or not our spacetime is curved in a higher dimension?

Curved spacetime is a mathematical model of nature. In the GR version of that model no higher dimensions are assumed, because they are unnecessary. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

However, embedding of curved 2D slices of spacetime into higher dimensional non-curved 3D spaces can be useful for visualization. And theories other than GR might postulate higher dimensional spaces, if it's necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes Abtinnn
  • #7
Abtinnn said:
Is there a way for us to find out whether or not our spacetime is curved in a higher dimension?

Not that I am aware of. There are people looking for the imprint of collisions between our observable universe and other "multi-verses" that could have happened during the period of inflation. If these are found (they have not been), this might be evidence that our universe is embedded in a higher dimensional space.
 
  • Like
Likes Abtinnn

1. How does mass bend spacetime?

The rubber sheet analogy is a useful way to understand how mass bends spacetime. Imagine a rubber sheet stretched out flat. When a heavy object, like a bowling ball, is placed on the sheet, it creates a dip or indentation. This is similar to how a massive object, like a planet, creates a dip in the fabric of spacetime. The heavier the object, the deeper the dip, and the more it bends spacetime.

2. Why is the rubber sheet analogy used to explain mass and spacetime?

The rubber sheet analogy is used because it helps us visualize the concept of spacetime, which is a complex and abstract idea. It allows us to understand how mass affects the fabric of spacetime and how objects are attracted to each other due to this bending.

3. Is the rubber sheet analogy an accurate representation of how mass bends spacetime?

The rubber sheet analogy is a simplification of the concept of spacetime and should not be taken as a literal representation. In reality, spacetime is a four-dimensional fabric, and the bending caused by mass is much more complex than a two-dimensional rubber sheet. However, the analogy is a helpful way to understand the general idea of how mass and spacetime interact.

4. Does the rubber sheet analogy apply to all objects in space, or just planets and stars?

The rubber sheet analogy can be applied to all objects with mass, from the smallest particles to the largest celestial bodies. However, the amount of bending that occurs depends on the mass of the object. The more massive the object, the more it bends spacetime.

5. How does the rubber sheet analogy relate to Einstein's theory of general relativity?

The rubber sheet analogy is often used to explain the concept of spacetime, which is a fundamental concept in Einstein's theory of general relativity. According to this theory, mass causes spacetime to curve, and this curvature is what we experience as gravity. The rubber sheet analogy helps us understand this relationship between mass, spacetime, and gravity.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
480
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
878
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
908
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
73
Views
13K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
Back
Top