Is correct to affirm that:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]| \nabla \times \vec{f} | = \nabla \times \vec{f} \cdot \hat{n}[/tex]?

I asked thinking in this definition:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curl_(mathematics)

Ie, if the affirmation above is correct, so, is correct to express the definition aboce as:

[tex]\lim_{A \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{|A|}\oint _{C} \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = |\nabla \times \vec{f} |[/tex]?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Abs of curl

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - curl | Date |
---|---|

A How can curl of 4-vector or 6-vector be writen? | May 22, 2016 |

Div and curl | Feb 4, 2016 |

Curl in 5D using levi-civita tensor | Jun 22, 2014 |

Gradient and Curl | Apr 9, 2014 |

Curl in 2D is a vector or a scalar? | Mar 26, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**