Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Accelerating charged particles and FOR

  1. Aug 7, 2004 #1
    if, say, an electron is stationary on earth (ignore the probability or possibility of this for now). it, of course, is not emitting any EM radiation. However, an observer in space (stationary with reference to the sun) is looking at the electron. relative to them, the electron is accelerating (circular motion around the earth). is any EM radiation emitted? where have i gone wrong here?
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 8, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I don't think you've gone wrong at all. As I understand it, photon number is not conserved in arbitrary coordinate transformations, so it's normal to see a different number of photons in accelerated and non-accelerated coordinate systems, including cases where one sees zero number of photons and the other sees non-zero numbers of photons.
  4. Aug 8, 2004 #3
    so basically it is possible for the external observer to see photons being emitted. but then theres the question of whether these photons can be used for any constructive purpose. is this violating conservation of energy principles?
  5. Aug 8, 2004 #4
    Why do charged particles emit light when accelerated anyways??
  6. Aug 8, 2004 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    There are various applets that show what the electric field lines of an accelerating charge looks like. For instance


    It's fairly easy to see from these that the electric field lines of an accelerating charge get "kinked".

    The example in the above URL where you suddenly stop a moving charge exhibits this "kinking" process especially well.

    The argument that the kink represents the emission of radiation is harder to follow,IMO, though it is easy to see that such a kink represents a rapidly changing electric field and hence generates a magnetic field. It's probable I'm missing some simple explanation.

    The detailed explanation is given by the Lamor formula for an accelerating charge, for instance

  7. Aug 11, 2004 #6
    Awsome sites, thanks a lot. :)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Accelerating charged particles and FOR
  1. Charged Particles (Replies: 2)