Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Acceleration universe

  1. Jun 28, 2014 #1
    Using the friedmann equations, is it possible to find the acceleration of the universe at a given time?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 28, 2014 #2

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Hi, Ledsnyder, and welcome to PF!

    If you define "the acceleration of the universe" as the second time derivative of the scale factor, then yes, the Friedmann equations (specifically the second one) can be used to solve for it. However, in order to find a solution, you have to know the density ##\rho## and the pressure ##p## as a function of time. If there is a cosmological constant (as we think there is in our actual universe), you have to know that as well.
     
  4. Jun 28, 2014 #3

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Not if you think of acceleration as something measured in Length/Time2

    The scale factor is a dimensionless quantity a(t) normalized so that a(present) = 1.

    It has no Length scale.

    So the first derivative of the scale factor is a "PER UNIT TIME" quantity. It is not a speed. It is not a Length/time quantity. And the second derivative of the scale factor is not an acceleration (not a change in speed).
    It is a "PER UNIT TIME PER UNIT TIME" quantity.

    the "speed of expansion of the universe" at a given time is not defined,
    and the "acceleration of the universe" at a given time is not defined.

    Ben Crowell has a cosmology FAQ about this. Shouldn't we promote his FAQ items more?, some are pretty good. :^)
     
  5. Jun 29, 2014 #4

    PeterDonis

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Doesn't this depend on which form of the FRW metric you adopt? I believe there is at least one form where all three spatial coordinates are "angular", so to speak, i.e., they don't have any "length scale" by themselves. In this form, the length scale is in the scale factor.

    I agree, though, that since even if the above is true, it's coordinate-dependent, the scale factor is best not thought of as a "distance", so its second time derivative is not an "acceleration" in the ordinary sense of the term. I should have made that clearer in my post.
     
  6. Jun 29, 2014 #5

    Jorrie

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The solution I use is from the handbook 'Principles of Physical Cosmology', PJE Peebles, 1993 (Princeton Press), Eq 5.54, pp. 100:

    [tex] \ddot{a} = a H_0^2(\Omega_{\Lambda}-\Omega_m/(2a^3))[/tex]

    To find it at a given time, you need to find [itex]a[/itex] for your desired time, which is not so easy when a cosmological constant is present. With nifty use of cosmological calculators (like Lightcone 7 in my sig), one can however find it quite accurately.

    Give it a try...

    PS: if you want to work with a < ~1/3000 (which is t < ~65,000 yrs), you should include a radiation energy density term, because radiation was then dominant.

    [tex] \ddot{a} = a H_0^2(\Omega_{\Lambda}-\Omega_m/(2a^3) -\Omega_r/a^4)[/tex]

    The 2013 density paramaters parameters are (in the order they appear in the brackets): 0.7, 0.3, 0.3/3400
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2014
  7. Jul 1, 2014 #6
    T (Gy) R (Gly)
    0.00037338 0.00062840
    0.00249614 0.00395626
    0.01530893 0.02347787
    0.09015807 0.13632116
    0.52234170 0.78510382
    2.97769059 4.37361531
    13.78720586 14.39993199
    32.88494318 17.18490043
    47.72506282 17.29112724
    62.59805320 17.29930703
    77.47372152 17.29980205
    92.34940681 17.29990021


    is there an equation that relates T and R?
     
  8. Jul 1, 2014 #7

    Jorrie

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I am not aware of a direct equation, so I use numerical integration to independently find T and R (the latter being the Hubble radius in 'Lightcone 7'). It is then possible to read off (or plot) R against T. The equations used in Lightcone 7 are here: http://cosmocalc.wikidot.com/advanced-user.

    The same goes for any of the D's, e.g. if you are interested in the radius of the observable universe over time, you can make a table including T and and the particle horizon (Dparticle in Lightcone 7).

    Please ask if you need further clarification.
     
  9. Jul 2, 2014 #8

    Jorrie

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    George Jones has given a useful set of equations in your "Hubble Radius and time" thread. It is valid where radiation energy density is negligible when compared to the other densities. For times later than some 65,000 years, you can thus find a(t) for any chosen time.

    However, AFAIK, you would still need to use a cosmological calculator to find some of other distances from the calculated a(t), e.g. to find the radius of the observable universe at that time. If anyone knows of a good approximation for Dparticle for the present matter-dark energy epoch, please let us know.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Acceleration universe
  1. Universe acceleration (Replies: 5)

  2. Accelerating universe? (Replies: 0)

  3. Accelerating universe (Replies: 13)

  4. Accelerating universe (Replies: 33)

Loading...