Acceptance & Rejection

  • Thread starter wuliheron
  • Start date
1,927
0
Many have pointed out here that obviously we do indeed exist in some sense, and that it is difficult if not impossible to discuss nonexistence, the origin of existence, etc. Along these same lines of reasoning, rejection can be seen as being predicated on acceptance. Unless we accept something we cannot reject anything. As with nonexistence, acceptance can be a slippery subject to discuss. However, it could also be possibly the only way to understand these other slippery concepts.

. Acceptance

Harmony is only in following the Way.
The Way of Happiness is
Without form or quality,
But expresses all forms and qualities;
The Way is hidden and implicate,
But expresses all of nature;
The Way is unchanging,
But expresses all motion.
Beneath sensation and memory
The Way is the source
Of all the world.
How can I understand the source of the world?
By accepting.
 

BoulderHead

I'm lousy with directions...

...which Way do I go?

Acceptance feels much to me like giving up. There is a part of me that just will not let me feel at ease until I have the answer for the great mystery of existence. Yet I know I will never have the answer...

Somewhere, in the back of mind, is a feeling of despair.
 
1,476
0
I really don't what to steal any of wuli's thunder, but acceptance is giving up. It is giving up trying, wrestling and letting it happen. We can't know the secret, paradox, of existance until we accept our existance and the existance of everything else including that which we can never know. In other words we must first exist to know existance. When we accept that we can not know and quit fighting it then in repose and harmony we will come to know. Not all at once but indicernable step by step we will come to know. Each step will lead us to the next and soon it will no longer concern us that we do not know and can not know. Then someday we will realize that we do know and have always known and we will laugh at how simple and wonderful and beautiful it is and at how silly we were to struggle so hard and so long and think that it was so difficult and complicated. We will laugh for days in delight and at ourselves. We will then know the unknowable and know that there is nothing to know.
 
1,927
0
Originally posted by Royce
I really don't what to steal any of wuli's thunder, but acceptance is giving up. It is giving up trying, wrestling and letting it happen. We can't know the secret, paradox, of existance until we accept our existance and the existance of everything else including that which we can never know.
This is exactly the kind of fundamentalist, black and white, good and evil, thinking that I have struggled to elucidate here. If I accept that gravity exists it does not mean that I stop looking for anti-gravity. Accepting that racism exists, does not mean I accept it must always exist. Nor, for that matter, does it mean I must believe Racism will some day cease to exist or we will someday find the answer to life, the universe, and everything.

In other words we must first exist to know existance. When we accept that we can not know and quit fighting it then in repose and harmony we will come to know. Not all at once but indicernable step by step we will come to know. Each step will lead us to the next and soon it will no longer concern us that we do not know and can not know. Then someday we will realize that we do know and have always known and we will laugh at how simple and wonderful and beautiful it is and at how silly we were to struggle so hard and so long and think that it was so difficult and complicated. We will laugh for days in delight and at ourselves. We will then know the unknowable and know that there is nothing to know.
If there is a God, Royce, then God would perhaps want us all to come to such a realization on our own. If there is no God, then again we must come to such a realization on our own. Paradox allows for this, but only if we are capable of acceptance.
 
1,476
0
Originally posted by wuliheron
This is exactly the kind of fundamentalist, black and white, good and evil, thinking that I have struggled to elucidate here. If I accept that gravity exists it does not mean that I stop looking for anti-gravity. Accepting that racism exists, does not mean I accept it must always exist. Nor, for that matter, does it mean I must believe Racism will some day cease to exist or we will someday find the answer to life, the universe, and everything.
Okay, wuli, you want a discussion/arguement. You got it.
I did not say to stop looking for or at anything nor is anything black and white. I said to quit fighting it, quit trying to find the unknowable and accept that you can not know the unknowable. You are, I know, playing the devil's advocate and sounding just like most westerners that acceptence is giving up and doing nothing. This stems from ignorance and misunderstanding, not yours, I know better, but westerners, like me.
Giving up is one of the hardest things that I have ever attempted to do because of the necessarily included paradox, ie. trying to give up is still trying to do something and not acceptance. I can't even write about it with my limited command of the english language, my mother tongue, because the word 'attempt' implies acting, trying, excerting my will. The paradox: How do we give up fighting, wrestling, trying without trying to do so? The answer, in your own words, ACCEPTANCE. By accecepting the futility of trying not to try.
It has nothing to do with giving up yet is giving up (I sound like the Toa myself, don't I?)
How can we find anti-gravity if we're blind to the fact that our minds are as closed as our eyes.
 

Les Sleeth

Gold Member
2,164
2
Originally posted by Royce
I said to quit fighting it, quit trying to find the unknowable and accept that you can not know the unknowable. . . . How do we give up fighting, wrestling, trying without trying to do so? The answer, in your own words, ACCEPTANCE. By accecepting the futility of trying not to try.
I have a little different take on at least the "inner" version of acceptance/surrender.

If one accepts that reality exists independently of what we think of it, and that reality "works" a certain way, then it seems practical to learn the "way" of reality, and harmonize with that. That's because reality is the way it is, and no amount of fighting that or complaining about it will ever change it. I am not talking about relative circumstances, which can be changed, but rather that part of reality which cannot be changed (e.g., physical laws).

But acceptance is only part of the story, because first one has to understand the "way" of reality one is going to harmonize with. Some here say, the "way" is only physical, and so once one has understood physical laws, all that needs to be known about reality has been understood. Some of us say maybe there is more, and so aren't in such a hurry to settle for the physical alone.

Science has made the physical available to us like never before, so I personally think people are jumping for that too fast; afterall, at least it offers something that is real. If there is more than the physical, the question becomes: how do we find a way to directly experience that? We need that because without the confirmation of experience, all the talk about "something more" than the physical is just speculation at worst, or at best some intuitive sense no one can really get at or explain to others in a discussion such as this.
 
1,476
0
Yes, Les, I agree and I know wuli does too but I'll let him say that.
Acceptance means accepting the world that way it really is and not the why we wish to be. Reality is both external and internal. The physical reality outside of us exist whether we look at it or not or accept it or not. Thus; "When it is raining let it rain." The harmony is harmonizing the internal with the external that is reality as well as finding harmoney within. The reality is that there is no internal and external there is only one reality that is existance.
 

BoulderHead

Acceptance means accepting the world that way it really is and not the why we wish to be.
Hey, maybe I've found acceptance then. This doesn't mean you have feel good about the situation does it?
 
1,927
0
Originally posted by Royce
Okay, wuli, you want a discussion/arguement. You got it.
I did not say to stop looking for or at anything nor is anything black and white. I said to quit fighting it,
First you said, quote: "Acceptance is giving up," and now you say what you said was "quit fighting it", yet somehow this is not a black and white view of acceptance and the two statements do not mean the same thing.

The paradox: How do we give up fighting, wrestling, trying without trying to do so? The answer, in your own words, ACCEPTANCE. By accecepting the futility of trying not to try.
It has nothing to do with giving up yet is giving up (I sound like the Toa myself, don't I?)
No offense, but what you sound like is confused.

I do not struggle, fight, or otherwise "try" to take my next breath. Even if I hold my breath until I pass out, I will still take that next breath and resisting or fighting has nothing to do with my taking my next breath. Breathing is a natural, spontaneous, and effortless activity on my part.

Now, of course you could claim that in some sense my body is fighting for life. However, the opposite view is much simpler. A Darwinist might put it to you that animals do not breath to survive, it is just that those which actually do breath live to see another day. Likewise, the animals that evolved breathing did not do so consciously or deliberately, but quite by accident.

Expanding upon this analogy with evolution and biology rejection, strife, struggle, fighting, etc. are also behaviors that animals did not self-select and do not struggle to maintain. They are innate and the reason the animals have them is because that is what nature had available and what survived. Nature it seems is inherently accepting, nurturing, giving.

That is the paradox of existence.
 

drag

Science Advisor
1,055
0
Greetings !

What about the observed data - the observed Universe ?!
It takes lots of effort to explore and deal with it -
life. If it would seem you're around already - what's
the point of giving up ? As a matter of fact, if that's
the way you choose to look at things - why keep living ?

However paradoxical things may be and seem some things
still just appear to us - emotions, thouhgt, experiences,
the world. So, why not just live your life and be guided
by these instead of being a vegetable ?

And btw, how about enjoying the benefit of the doubt in
the paradox ?

Live long and prosper.
 
1,927
0
Originally posted by drag
Greetings !

What about the observed data - the observed Universe ?!
It takes lots of effort to explore and deal with it -
life. If it would seem you're around already - what's
the point of giving up ? As a matter of fact, if that's
the way you choose to look at things - why keep living ?

However paradoxical things may be and seem some things
still just appear to us - emotions, thouhgt, experiences,
the world. So, why not just live your life and be guided
by these instead of being a vegetable ?

And btw, how about enjoying the benefit of the doubt in
the paradox ?

Live long and prosper.
Drag, often you do not address people by name and your writing is a bit confusing. Perhaps if you could clarify both right now it would help.
 
2,224
0
Originally posted by wuliheron
Many have pointed out here that obviously we do indeed exist in some sense, and that it is difficult if not impossible to discuss nonexistence, the origin of existence, etc. Along these same lines of reasoning, rejection can be seen as being predicated on acceptance. Unless we accept something we cannot reject anything. As with nonexistence, acceptance can be a slippery subject to discuss. However, it could also be possibly the only way to understand these other slippery concepts.
"I" am in the center of the Universe. Afterall the Universe is endless, and no matter where you go, you are in "its center." Hmm ... wouldn't that be another way of saying God embraces everything?
 
1,927
0
Re: Re: Acceptance & Rejection

Originally posted by Iacchus32
"I" am in the center of the Universe. Afterall the Universe is endless, and no matter where you go, you are in "its center." Hmm ... wouldn't that be another way of saying God embraces everything?
That would be the extreme extension of the concept. The heart of the idea is simply that we exist and have innate feelings of acceptance about our existence. Both believers and non-believers then can share a great deal in the way of feelings and perspectives, with the single exception being God of course. Thus they can understand and accept each other that much more.
 
1,476
0
When I said to give up, I did not mean to quit, to lay down our arms and die. Nor did I mean to quit searching or looking. We, most of us westerners any way, have been taught since birth that life is a struggle and we must run as fast as we can just to stay where we are. "God helps those who help themselves" How many time have I heard that one? We have been taught that it is by will power and determination that we accomplish anything.
I know that acceptance is foreign to our, western, ways of thought.
To put it into words you would use, acceptance is passive and female.
Acceptance of ourselves, our lives, and our reality is not an active striving thing that we we are all used to doing. It is a passive nonstriving thing. It is acceptance. Only in that way can we achieve it. By giving up the struggle to achieve acceptance we learn to accept what is. When we accept what is, our eyes are opened and we can see what really is, free of our preconceived notions, biases or desires. When we can see what really is then we can accomplish so much more than if we perceive reality as other than what it really is, but what we have been taught or lead to believe. Science just as ourselves can not learn anything new unless it is willing to give up its old outdated theories. Far to often many so called scientist are unwilling to give up those old ideas and paradigms and accept the new.
This is what , at least in part, what I mean by giving up.
 
Last edited:
1,476
0
Another part of what I mean by 'giving up' is to open our minds as well as our eyes to see what really is and all of the new possibilities that are.
I can't remember right now were I heard or read this. A Catholic priest was asked what the shortest prayer was. He replied;"F**k it, which is saying let go, let God."
This too is part of giving up, of acceptance.
 

Les Sleeth

Gold Member
2,164
2
Originally posted by Royce
Another part of what I mean by 'giving up' is to open our minds as well as our eyes to see what really is and all of the new possibilities that are.
I can't remember right now were I heard or read this. A Catholic priest was asked what the shortest prayer was. He replied;"F**k it, which is saying let go, let God."
This too is part of giving up, of acceptance.
Yes, this is one of the spiritual meanings; it is, in fact, exactly what Islam means.

I know of another and more everyday example too. The best racquetball player in our club is a joy to watch because he is so relaxed. No one hits harder and more accurately or moves faster, but if you watch him, it is hard to tell he is expending much effort. Michael Jordan moves like that too, or look at relaxed swing of Tiger Woods. Watch how a great horse rider merges with horse, and so on.

What I am suggesting is that "surrender" means relaxing into the conditions one needs to be truly successful. The real question to me is, what sorts of forces/conditions facillitate success? Physical condtions are the most obvious, but as you know I question if they are the only conditions one can learn to harmonize with and "ride" like that great equstrian.
 
1,476
0
No, I don't think that physical condition are the only ones we need to relax to. I think mental attitude is probably just as important if not more so. I watch a lot of golf on TV. The announcers are always saying that a player can't get out of his own way. He's over analysing his game. Tiger always talks about staying in the moment. They once ask Fred Couples what he does to make the ball draw or fade. He said; "Nothing I just walk up knowing the I need to draw the ball and it does.' I found that very Zen l1ke.
To become one with the horse requires as much mental as physical adjustment. As I said Harmony is both internal and external. Once true harmoney is reached the external and internal become one. There is no difference between them. This may last just as long as the ride or a life time. It may only be a few seconds during the ride or golf swing or whatever when we suddenly feel the difference and correctness of it and say "Oops, I did something right."
 
1,927
0
Well said Royce.

Drag hasn't gotten back to us yet, so I'll try to answer some of his questions and expand upon what you've said Royce.

Humanity is not merely subject to the paradox of existence, we Are the paradox. Just as nature creates and destroys, we create and destroy; as mysterious as the universe as a whole is, we ourselves are mysterious and the paradox has no apparent boundries. It is not merely an external or an internal phenomenon, not merely Materialistic nor Idealistic.

Accepting ourselves and the world around us is often difficult to do only because we have adopted habitual ways of abstractly catagorizing things as good and bad, right and wrong. In turn, habits and behaviors themselves are not so much the issue as our attitude towards them. As useful as such habits can be at times, at other times they are counterproductive. They remain nothing more or less than mechanistic tools which only we ourselves can animate and bring to life through the motivations of our attitudes which, in turn, help to shape new habits and atittudes.

To paraphrase R. W. Emerson, "Virtue is its own reward, to have a friend you must first be a friend." The opposite is also true and applies not only to the world around us, but more poinently to ourselves. One need not believe in a God or even that life has a specific meaning or rational way in which it can ultimately be conceptualized in order to appreciate the value of friendship. However, you do have to take that first step.

Cultivating

Cultivate harmony within yourself,
And harmony becomes real;
Cultivate harmony within your family,
And harmony becomes fertile;
Cultivate harmony within your community,
And harmony becomes abundant;
Cultivate harmony within your culture,
And harmony becomes enduring;
Cultivate harmony within the world,
And harmony becomes ubiquitous.
Live with a person to understand that person;
Live with a family to understand that family;
Live with a community
To understand that community;
Live with a culture to understand that culture;
Live with the world to understand the world.
How can I live with the world?
By accepting.
 
Last edited:

drag

Science Advisor
1,055
0
Greetings !
Originally posted by wuliheron
Drag, often you do not address people by name and your writing is a bit confusing. Perhaps if you could clarify both right now it would help.
I appologize for the inconvinience. :wink:

As you may've guessed (I personally thought it was
quite clear) I adressed you and the subject of this
thread of yours.

You speak of the Way and of ecceptance. But paradox
or not we do appear to exist - think, feel, live.
Our emotions and thoughts are not entirely indpendent
(probably at least, according to science) unlike what
it seemed to me that you implied - writings on
a blanck page. Recognizing the PoE does not mean
that I shouldn't pursue what I want to pursue, feel
what I want to feel or do what I want to do. It
does not mean that I should drop into my meditation
chair and turn into a vegetable. Why live at all then ?
Why not just cut your own throat and get it over
with. I highly disagree with this Universal acceptance
approach. You can accept some things and, if you wish,
can fight for others - not because you think they're
really "right" but because that's what you want to do
and that's the view that makes you feel good.

Would you call that denial ?
Maybe it is, but that's the only guide I have -
what I want to do. For me this Way of yours is denial.

Live long and prosper.
 

Les Sleeth

Gold Member
2,164
2
Originally posted by drag
Greetings !

I appologize for the inconvinience. :wink:

As you may've guessed (I personally thought it was
quite clear) I adressed you and the subject of this
thread of yours.

You speak of the Way and of ecceptance. But paradox
or not we do appear to exist - think, feel, live.
Our emotions and thoughts are not entirely indpendent
(probably at least, according to science) unlike what
it seemed to me that you implied - writings on
a blanck page. Recognizing the PoE does not mean
that I shouldn't pursue what I want to pursue, feel
what I want to feel or do what I want to do. It
does not mean that I should drop into my meditation
chair and turn into a vegetable. Why live at all then ?
Why not just cut your own throat and get it over
with. I highly disagree with this Universal acceptance
approach. You can accept some things and, if you wish,
can fight for others - not because you think they're
really "right" but because that's what you want to do
and that's the view that makes you feel good.

Would you call that denial ?
Maybe it is, but that's the only guide I have -
what I want to do. For me this Way of yours is denial.

Live long and prosper.
Hmmm. I am not sure about Wuli's beliefs, so I don't want to say you've misunderstood him, but I am familiar with some of the philosophy of acceptance/surrender, and what you are describing isn't it. However, if not properly understood, one might interpret acceptance in a fatalistic way (and plenty of people have misunderstood it that way), and then I'd agree with you about the weakness of such a philosophy.

This weekend I was around two families. In one the father was so tolerant, accepting of his young children, yet he continuously worked to guide them. The second family was headed by a relatively young man attempting to be a stepfather for the first time. He had the two young boys all but saluting (they did have to say "yes sir"). Now, you can imagine which set of kids were happier and healthier.

In my opinion, the deep meaning of acceptance is to understand the true nature of reality and harmonize with that. It really only applies to that because reality is the one thing you cannot fight and win. All the suffering of the world is brought about by people who don't understand how to accept this truth, just like the dad who was withholding love until the children were behaving perfectly doesn't understand reality. Children are made a certain way, and when the father understands and accepts what the children need FIRST he is more likely to be successful at any thing he wants to achieve with them.

Acceptance gets "deep" when one starts including as part of reality God or Truth. Total surrender to that aspect of reality has been an important part of the so-called "mystical" path.
 

drag

Science Advisor
1,055
0
Originally posted by LW Sleeth
It really only applies to that because reality is the one
thing you cannot fight and win. All the suffering of the
world is brought about by people who don't understand how
to accept this truth,
I completely disagree with this over-idealistic view.

Although we apparently have certain basic tendencies
we do not think or want the same things. Most of
us indeed do what we want. The great ristrictions
upon our actions and thus wishes are forced by
social order - a delicate balance between the
intrests of people and their need to co-exist
in a stable condition. Suffering for the majority
of the world does not have its source in the few
that impose their will on the many (as has been
a long time ago in the past), but rather in the many
that impose their will upon themselves. Further more,
the huge amount of people on the planet, their
resource consumption rate and their average
life-style that is higher than the planet's ability
to support it for such a population, are continuing
to decrease the possible range of freedom one can
be allowed to possess in a stable society, no matter
the type of order in that society. This also leads
to suffering and more of it.

Our societies try to compensate for these factors by
increasing the "superficial" and "artificial" perceptions
of freedom: by changing the types of social order, by striving
for equality - centering around the average, by focusing
on the smaller aspects and through education and
more stable and suttle social norms. But, the
instability is there, it's basic and inescapable
and as long as 2+ people co-exist it will always be
there in some amount and hence also the most
important factor for suffering will too.

Suffering...:frown: can't live with it, can't live without it. :wink:

Live long and prosper.
 
1,927
0
Originally posted by LW Sleeth
In my opinion, the deep meaning of acceptance is to understand the true nature of reality and harmonize with that. It really only applies to that because reality is the one thing you cannot fight and win. All the suffering of the world is brought about by people who don't understand how to accept this truth, just like the dad who was withholding love until the children were behaving perfectly doesn't understand reality. Children are made a certain way, and when the father understands and accepts what the children need FIRST he is more likely to be successful at any thing he wants to achieve with them.
Taoists especially prefer to use words like "harmonious" and "dischordant" rather than good or bad for just this reason. Harmony is not something you create, but rather, a naturally occuring phenomenon you allow. In order to perceive the paradox of existence as fully as possible we must be able to allow ourselves to be in harmony with it. This is the point I think Drag is missing.

We can abstractly conceive of the paradox as it existed in the past and as we might conceive it existing in the future, but to perceive it in the moment we must be in harmony with it. Abstractions have countless useses, but only because we can give them context in the present reality we experience and observe.

Drag is correct in that this does not mean we must sit on a rock and meditate in order to experience the paradox as fully as possible, however, meditation is one of countless widely acknowledged for cultivating harmony with the paradox. Tiger Woods, who is half Asian, focuses on being happy and content with life. Michael Jordon says when he is on the court it just seems like everyone else is moving in slow motion.

Of course, we can just accept our own feelings and thoughts no matter how negative. If we want to kill ourselves, we can do that. If we want to kill others, we can do that. If we wish to hate ourselves and others, we can obviously do so. If we want to fight the good fight, we can do that. The real question might be simply how do you really want to do it rather than which way is the most productive. Both ways of looking at life involve circular logic after all. That's paradox for you.
 

drag

Science Advisor
1,055
0
Greetings !

I believe you misunderstood me wuli. Please
correct me if I'm wrong, but you're saying that
I too propose a way to deal, primarily, with the PoE.
I do not, the PoE is not my center at all.
My way is to remember it for all the potential
uses it contains and keep it at "the back of my head",
but not at all dwell on it or consider it on a daily
basis. I don't care about that deep stuff that much.
I do enjoy plunging into the depths of thought and
finding solutions and I can have some vague direct
uses for the conclusions, but overall - I don't care
about it that much. I care more for much simpler and
seemingly tangible stuff that ussualy have a much
more direct impact upon me.

Paradox is not my life though my life may be a paradox.
Me (copyrights reserved)

Live long and prosper.
 
1,927
0
Originally posted by drag

Paradox is not my life though my life may be a paradox.
Me (copyrights reserved)

Live long and prosper. [/B]
To say that paradox is not your life is a statement of belief about paradox which, of course, presents a paradox in its own rite.
 

drag

Science Advisor
1,055
0
Originally posted by wuliheron
To say that paradox is not your life is a statement
of belief about paradox which, of course, presents a
paradox in its own right.
That's the great thing about these smart-ass
quotes - they can mean anything...
 

Related Threads for: Acceptance & Rejection

Replies
25
Views
6K
  • Posted
Replies
10
Views
913
  • Posted
Replies
22
Views
10K
  • Posted
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Posted
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top