• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Accleration problem

  • Thread starter tucky
  • Start date
30
0
First off, thanks to all who helped me on my last questions. It is greatly appreciated that you are willing to help alleviate my physics stress! I am sure there will be many more questions to come. In fact, here is another physic's predicament that I am stranded over.

Background: I am doing a project dealing with a car (Jaguar S-Type R). I have calculated the power (P = E/t) and the Kinetic energy (KE = 1/2mv2)

Question: If the engine generates a constant power of Pavg, calculate the time it would take to accelerate from 0-30mph, 0-40mph, etc.

I know the speeds (v0 = 0mph, v = 30mph), mass (1847.48kg), power (171.3078Hp, or 94219.284 ft-lbs/s), and Kinetic energy (664,537.1725J)

So, can I calculate the Force by converting 94219.284ft-lbs/s into Newtons? I really do not know what ft-lbs/s can be converted. If I was able to determine the force of this car than I could use Newton’s second law equation: acceleration (Sum of Force)/(time) this would determine the acceleration; and then I could determine the sec by using this equation: a = change in v/ time

I think I am completely off track, if any one could help me it would be greatly appreciated!!!
 

dduardo

Staff Emeritus
1,894
3
Power = work / time = W/t

You state the power is equal to 171.3078Hp, which is equal to 127.744kW

v = 30mph = 13.4112m/s

K = (1/2)*m*v^2 = .5 * 1847.48 * 13.4112^2 = 166,144J

Using the work-energy theorem W = K2 - K1, where K2 = 166,144J and K1 = 0J.

W = 166,144J

Therefore the time it takes to reach the power (or go from 0 to 30mph) is:

t = W/P = 166,144J / 127.744kW = 1.3s
 

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,712
876
Notice that dduardo did NOT calculate force!

Since power (i.e. "horsepower") is work/time (energy/time), he
calculated the change in kinetic energy between "0-30mph, 0-40mph, etc." and then calculated how much time was required to give that much energy. In other words, he used "conservation of energy".
 

Related Threads for: Accleration problem

  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
844
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
964
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
859
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
10K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top