1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Accreting matter paradox

  1. May 18, 2006 #1


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    In the course of treating the problem of an infinitely conducting gas accreting to a star in the presence of a magnetic field, I ran across the following problem. If the magnetic field and velocity are confined to a plane (which we'll call the [itex]\theta=\pi/2[/itex] plane), and if they only depend on r, then the only component of E is:

    [tex]E_\theta = \frac{1}{c} (v_r B_\phi - v_\phi B_r) [/tex]

    In the steady state, [itex] \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = 0[/itex], and this requires [itex] E_\theta \propto 1/r[/itex]. It is reasonable to assume that the density approaches some constant non-zero value at infinity, which by the continuity equation [itex]\rho v_r r^2=[/itex] const implies [itex]v_r \propto 1/r^2[/itex]. Also [itex]\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} =0[/itex] implies [itex]B_r \propto 1/r^2[/itex]. Then for some non-zero constant [itex]\kappa[/itex]

    [tex] 1/r \propto E_\theta \propto (B_\phi - \kappa v_\phi)/r^2[/tex]

    But then [itex]B_\phi - \alpha v_\phi \propto r[/itex], so at least one of [itex]v_\phi, B\phi[/itex] must blow up as r goes to infinity, clearly absurd. What is the problem here?
    Last edited: May 18, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. May 25, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Anyone have any ideas?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Accreting matter paradox
  1. Laser paradox? (Replies: 6)

  2. Zeno's paradox (Replies: 6)