Why is the reaction force different when passing through different materials?

  • B
  • Thread starter Kaneki123
  • Start date
In summary, the force applied by the person on the plank is less than the weight at first, but it is Maximum when the plank is finally pulled down.
  • #1
Kaneki123
120
3
I am having a little bit trouble with understanding action-reaction...I am going to discuss three scenarios...Please tell me about the action-reaction in them
Okay...let's assume about a body A that is positively accelerated upto a certain velocity...This body A is in an isolated system...
Ist: If this body A enters in a field of air, it will actually PASS THROUGH (ofcourse with some decreased velocity)
2nd: If the body A enters a field of water, again it will pass through(although with an even more decreased velcity than that in Ist)
3rd:If the body A tries to go through solid( let's say wall or table), it will not pass through...
My question is that, in all of these scenarios,the body A will come in contact with some molecules or particles and in all cases the force it applies on these molecules is same...(So reaction will also be same)...So why is that the body A can pass through less molecule area(air) and will not pass through more molecule area(solid)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Kaneki123 said:
My question is that, in all of these scenarios,the body A will come in contact with some molecules or particles and in all cases the force it applies on these molecules is same...
The force that the body applies will not be the same in the three cases.
 
  • #3
jbriggs444 said:
The force that the body applies will not be the same in the three cases.
Can you please elaborate as to why the force will not be same? Is it because less number of molecules?
 
  • #4
It is not the number of molecules exactly. It is the way they are structured. A solid is not simply a very dense gas. It is rigid. The molecules are interconnected. If you push on one side, all the other molecules move as well. That means that as you push on one face of a solid, that face cannot simply move out of your way. It will stay right there. Think of running head first into a sheet of tissue paper or into a brick wall. Which one involves more force on your nose?
 
  • #5
The force is equal to a change in momentum over time. Which has more momentum: moving air, moving water, moving a table?
 
  • #6
jbriggs444 said:
It is not the number of molecules exactly. It is the way they are structured. A solid is not simply a very dense gas. It is rigid. The molecules are interconnected. If you push on one side, all the other molecules move as well. That means that as you push on one face of a solid, that face cannot simply move out of your way. It will stay right there. Think of running head first into a sheet of tissue paper or into a brick wall. Which one involves more force on your nose?
Okay...Let's take another example...Consider a person standing on a thin wooden plank...The amount of force by the person on the plank is equal to that person's weight...But that plank pulls down until it can support the person...So at first, when the person just mounted on the plank, when the plank is just going to pull down, is the amount of force applied by the person on the plank at that specific time actually lesser than the actual force? (the total weight of that person)...So that when the plank is finally pulled down, that's the moment the person's force on the plank is 'maximum'(the actual weight of person)?...I hope you understand the confusion...
 
  • #7
Kaneki123 said:
Okay...Let's take another example...Consider a person standing on a thin wooden plank...The amount of force by the person on the plank is equal to that person's weight...But that plank pulls down until it can support the person...So at first, when the person just mounted on the plank, when the plank is just going to pull down, is the amount of force applied by the person on the plank at that specific time actually lesser than the actual force? (the total weight of that person)...So that when the plank is finally pulled down, that's the moment the person's force on the plank is 'maximum'(the actual weight of person)?...I hope you understand the confusion...
When the person accelerates down, the force is less than the weight. When it accelerates up, it's more than the weight.
 
  • #8
Kaneki123 said:
Okay...Let's take another example...Consider a person standing on a thin wooden plank...The amount of force by the person on the plank is equal to that person's weight...But that plank pulls down until it can support the person...So at first, when the person just mounted on the plank, when the plank is just going to pull down, is the amount of force applied by the person on the plank at that specific time actually lesser than the actual force? (the total weight of that person)...So that when the plank is finally pulled down, that's the moment the person's force on the plank is 'maximum'(the actual weight of person)?...I hope you understand the confusion...
I think this is getting away from what "Action - Reaction Pairs" (or Newtons Third Law pairs) is all about. Whatever force is acting on an object, there is another force (equal and opposite) acting on whatever it is that is causing that force. The actual value of the force will depend on the circumstances (as in the three cases that were discussed originally but the same principle applies. The multiple forces which are involved in equilibrium situations are an entirely different matter and all of the forces acting in that case will consist of third law pairs - tension on the tether / gravitational pull / rocket engine thrust etc will all be acting on the fixing point, the Earth and the particles that the engine is ejecting as well as on the rocket. Whether or not you have equilibrium forces on the rocket is a different issue.
 

What is an action-reaction pair?

An action-reaction pair refers to the principle that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that when an object exerts a force on another object, the second object will exert an equal and opposite force back on the first object.

How do action-reaction pairs relate to Newton's Third Law of Motion?

Action-reaction pairs are a manifestation of Newton's Third Law of Motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that forces always occur in pairs and are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

What are some real-life examples of action-reaction pairs?

One example of an action-reaction pair is when you push against a wall. Your body exerts a force on the wall, and the wall exerts an equal and opposite force back on your body. Another example is when a rocket is launched into space. The force of the rocket's engines pushing downward on the ground creates an equal and opposite force pushing the rocket upwards.

Can action-reaction pairs be broken?

No, action-reaction pairs cannot be broken. They are a fundamental law of physics that applies to all objects and forces. However, action-reaction pairs can cancel each other out, resulting in a net force of zero.

How do action-reaction pairs affect the motion of objects?

Action-reaction pairs play a crucial role in determining the motion of objects. When two objects interact, the forces they exert on each other will cause them to accelerate in opposite directions. This can result in the objects moving towards each other, away from each other, or in a circular motion.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
435
Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
859
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
978
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
179
Back
Top