Addition of Forces

  • #1
Two adults and a child want to push a wheeled cart in the direction marked x in the figure (attached). The two adults push with horizontal forces F1 and F2 as shown in the figure (attached).

A) Find the magnitude of the smallest force that the child should exert. You can ignore the effects of friction.
B) Find the angle force makes with +x-direction. Take the angles positive measured counterclockwize from the +x-direction.
C) If the child exerts the minimum force found in part (A) and in part (B) , the cart accelerates at 2.0 m/s^2 in the +x - direction. What is the weight of the cart?

A) I was able to do this one fine by finding the x and y components of both forces and then finding the difference between the y components. No issue there.

B) I am completely at a loss as to what exactly they want. Is it just me or is this question poorly worded, or is that just on purpose? Anyway this is where I need a hand. I've tried using the answer I found for A (a third y force, that of the child if you will) and taking the arctan of it/the total force in x. No luck there. I've tried subtracting the arctan(force of the child/Force 2 in x) from arctan(force of the child/Force 1 in x). No luck there. I've also tried adding both of the previous angles together, and still no luck.

Can anyone offer any insight into how to approach this? I'd really appreciate it.

As far as C is concerned I am fairly certain that once I get B I'll be able to figure it out, so that can wait... for now at least. :P

EDIT: Forgot to attach the figure. Oops!
 

Attachments

  • yf.Figure.4.29.jpg
    yf.Figure.4.29.jpg
    18.4 KB · Views: 1,668

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Doc Al
Mentor
45,209
1,549
Man, part B is one poorly worded problem. Are they talking about the force from part A? (Did you copy it exactly? If that's your text, you have my sympathy.) If I had to guess what they might mean in B, I would say: What is the angle that the force of the child (from part A) makes?

In any case, the way I read the problem, parts A and C are clear enough to solve even without B.
 
  • #3
Did you copy it exactly?

Yep. I know, it is horrid haha. I'm going to give part C a shot.
 
  • #4
15
0
As you figured out in part a, the smallest force should only require the boy to balance out the y component. In part b, I believe the question is asking for the angle this force makes with respect to the x-axis and since this force is downward, the angle should be 270. For part c, you just need to sum up forces in the x-direction and divide by the acceleration to find the mass.
 
  • #5
Doc Al
Mentor
45,209
1,549
part b

PureEnergy said:
In part b, I believe the question is asking for the angle this force makes with respect to the x-axis and since this force is downward, the angle should be 270.
That's exactly how I interpreted it.
 
  • #6
PureEnergy said:
For part c, you just need to sum up forces in the x-direction and divide by the acceleration to find the mass.

B was correct, and makes perfect sense.

C is incorrect though as the problem is asking for the weight, not the mass. It gives the acceleration, however, there is no mass given. Since the answer it wants is the weight (in N) that leaves no purpose for the acceleration, as far as I can tell.

If we were given mass then yes, we would need to multiply by the acceleration to find the weight. Or like you said if we were solving for mass, then divide the forces by the acceleration. That isn't the case though...

So with that in mind I've tried totaling F1 (100N) + F2 (140N) + F3 (16.6N since its only in the Y), however that answer is wrong. I've also tried totaling just the X values (F1_x = 100 cos 60 = 50N) + (F2_x = 140 cos 30 = 121.24N) however that is wrong as well.
 
  • #7
26
0
C is incorrect though as the problem is asking for the weight, not the mass. It gives the acceleration, however, there is no mass given. Since the answer it wants is the weight (in N) that leaves no purpose for the acceleration, as far as I can tell.

But once you find the mass, you can calculate the weight. The net force in the x-direction causes the acceleration given. You know the relation between force, mass and acceleration, so you can solve the mass.
 
  • #8
3
0
Hi, I'm having the same problem. I have figured out parts A and B. For C, I have F = m*a, where a=2m/s^2. So, to find m I divide F (=171.24N) by a (=2m/2^2) to get 85.62 mkg. So, to find the weight in N, I'm trying to divide by the earth's acceleration 9.8m/s^2 and get 8.74N. However, This is wrong. Any help?
 
  • #9
You would want to multiply by the Earth's acceleration, not divide, as you have 85.62 for your mass, and mass * acceleration = weight.
 
  • #10
Doc Al
Mentor
45,209
1,549
Why are you dividing mass by an acceleration?




Edit: underthebridge beat me to it!
 
Last edited:
  • #11
3
0
thanks, that makes sense now that I consider units.
 

Related Threads on Addition of Forces

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
413
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
425
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
3K
Top