Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Adjoint of f?

  1. Sep 9, 2006 #1
    Definition: Let f:V->V be a linear transformation on an inner product space V. The adjoint f* of f is a linear transformation f*:V->V satisfying
    <f(v),w>=<v,f*(w)> for all v,w in V.

    My question is would <f*(v),w>=<v,f(w)> be equivalent to the above formula in the definition? If so why?

    where <,> denote inner products.
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 9, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Yes, it would be equivalent to your restricted definition. However, a more common, more general definition of "adjoint" is
    If f is a linear transformation from one inner product space, U, to another inner product space, V, then the adjoint of f, f*, is the function from V to U such that
    <f(u),v>V= <u, f*(v)>U. The subscripts indicate that < , >V is the inner product in V, < , >U is the inner product in U. Of course, since f is from U to V, in order for f(u) to be defined, u must be in U and then f(u) is in V. Conversely, in order for f*(v) to be defined v must be in V and then f*(v) is in U.
    In that case, you could not just reverse the inner product. It is still true, however, that "adjoint" is a "dual" concept; the adjoint of f* is f itself.

    (Oh, and the very important special case of "self-adjoint" only applies in the case of f:U-> U.)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Adjoint of f?
  1. Adjoint Functors (Replies: 3)

  2. Adjoint operator (Replies: 8)

  3. Adjoint of an operator (Replies: 9)

  4. Adjoint operators (Replies: 10)