Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Adjoint operator

  1. Feb 4, 2010 #1
    I recently teach myself linear algebra with Friedberg's textbook.
    And I have a question about adjoint operator, which is on p.367.

    Definition Let T : V → W be a linear transformation where V and W are finite-dimensional inner product spaces with inner products <‧,‧> and <‧,‧>' respectively. A funtion T* : W → V is called an adjoint of T if <T(x),y>' = <x,T*(x)> for all x in V and y in W.

    Then ,my question is how to prove that there is a unique adjoint T* of T ?

    Can anyone give me some tips ? thanks^^
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 4, 2010 #2

    radou

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Assume that there is another adjoint transformation, let's say T**.
     
  4. Feb 4, 2010 #3
    To show that there exists such a function, let [tex]v_1, \ldots , v_n[/tex] be an orthonormal basis for V, so that [tex]x = \sum_i \langle x,v_i\rangle v_i[/tex] for any x in V then we have for all x in V and y in W:

    [tex]\langle T(x), y\rangle ' = \langle T (\sum_i \langle x,v_i\rangle v_i ), y\rangle '[/tex]
    [tex] = \sum_i \langle x, v_i\rangle \langle T(v_i), y\rangle '[/tex]
    [tex] = \langle x, \sum_i \overline{ \langle T(v_i),y\rangle '} v_i\rangle [/tex]
    which is in the form that we'd like.

    Which shows that [tex]T^*(y) = \sum_i \overline{\langle T(v_i),y\rangle '} v_i[/tex] for all y in W works.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2010
  5. Feb 4, 2010 #4
    really appreciate^^
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2010
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: Adjoint operator
  1. Adjoint of an operator (Replies: 8)

  2. Adjoint operator (Replies: 8)

  3. Adjoint of an operator (Replies: 9)

  4. Adjoint operators (Replies: 10)

Loading...