1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Adjunct operator proof (simple!) please tell me if I am right.

  1. Mar 27, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Hi, I am trying to show that ([tex] \lambda \hat{1})^{t} = \lambda^* \hat{1} [/tex]

    where [tex] \lambda \in [/tex] C (complex numbers)

    and [tex] \hat{1} [/tex] is the identity operator.

    3. The attempt at a solution

    [tex]\int \Psi^* (\lambda \hat{1} )^{t} \Psi d^{3} {r} = \int (\lambda \hat{1} \Psi)^* \Psi d^{3} {r}[/tex]

    = [tex]\lambda^*\int (\hat{1}\Psi)^* \Psi d^{3} {r} [/tex]

    = [tex]\int \Psi^* \lambda^*\hat{1}^{t} \Psi d^{3} {r} [/tex]

    finally, since [tex]\hat{1}[/tex] is hermitian, [tex]\hat{1}^{t}[/tex] = [tex]\hat{1}[/tex]


    [tex]\int \Psi^* (\lambda\hat{1})^{t} \Psi d^{3} {r}[/tex] = [tex]\int \Psi^* \lambda^*\hat{1} \Psi d^{3} {r}[/tex]

    Am I correct? (please excuse my multiple re-edits, I am learning the notation on the fly)
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2010
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted