- #1
shintashi
- 117
- 1
While pondering the emmensity of extremely massive egos... I began to think of the cosmological constants, and how one would decipher such things.
I do believe that the Density of Aether, hence the permeation of any substantial effect such as the ripple of light, is variable, however, the scale of radius to which it alters becomes exponentially unnoticeable, based upon the x^2/(x+y)^2 variable as proposed originally for creating a gateway to accelerate a mass without tearing it to peices.
Let x represent the astronomical radius from the central distortion, and let Y represent the are covered, usually on a less than astronomical scale.
For example, if you at at the center of a black hole, or stellar mass, your perpsective of the constant will be greatly different than it would be 10,000 astronomical units away. The key point here is noticeable difference. The question is " how sensitive" is material being used to test such distortions ?
at 150,000,000,000 m, or ~1 AU, the distortion difference between 1 meter and another, would be 2.25e22 / 2.2500000000300000000001e22,
or to say
9.999999999866666666668% similarity. I think it would be even more interesting to calculate in the actual wave/gravitational distortion of the mass itself, which following the electrical scale of reduction, would become exponentially less and less depending on the mass/energy disturbance.
Thus a black hole may exibit this kind of distortion at much closer range, but only so much as the mass of the black hole is also great (black holes come in all sizes).
What I also propose is that a magnetar may create a similar disturbance to the units of spacetime when measuring the Constant. In other words, I'm trying to figure out a way of calculating "constant".
I believe once we have a method of calculating "constant", we can then look at this constant as a "sound barrier" and in similar fashion, exceed it. Of course, we would have to relook at our doppler sciences...
I do believe that the Density of Aether, hence the permeation of any substantial effect such as the ripple of light, is variable, however, the scale of radius to which it alters becomes exponentially unnoticeable, based upon the x^2/(x+y)^2 variable as proposed originally for creating a gateway to accelerate a mass without tearing it to peices.
Let x represent the astronomical radius from the central distortion, and let Y represent the are covered, usually on a less than astronomical scale.
For example, if you at at the center of a black hole, or stellar mass, your perpsective of the constant will be greatly different than it would be 10,000 astronomical units away. The key point here is noticeable difference. The question is " how sensitive" is material being used to test such distortions ?
at 150,000,000,000 m, or ~1 AU, the distortion difference between 1 meter and another, would be 2.25e22 / 2.2500000000300000000001e22,
or to say
9.999999999866666666668% similarity. I think it would be even more interesting to calculate in the actual wave/gravitational distortion of the mass itself, which following the electrical scale of reduction, would become exponentially less and less depending on the mass/energy disturbance.
Thus a black hole may exibit this kind of distortion at much closer range, but only so much as the mass of the black hole is also great (black holes come in all sizes).
What I also propose is that a magnetar may create a similar disturbance to the units of spacetime when measuring the Constant. In other words, I'm trying to figure out a way of calculating "constant".
I believe once we have a method of calculating "constant", we can then look at this constant as a "sound barrier" and in similar fashion, exceed it. Of course, we would have to relook at our doppler sciences...