Affordable hurricane-resistant housing, can we do it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noisy Rhysling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    housing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating affordable hurricane-resistant housing. Participants explore various design concepts, materials, and construction techniques that could enhance durability against hurricanes and flooding, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that elevating houses to avoid standing water damage is crucial, referencing past flooding experiences.
  • Others argue that housing design should integrate with natural features to improve durability and affordability, proposing aerodynamic structures to reduce wind forces.
  • A participant mentions the idea of building homes into hillsides, citing "Bag End" as a model for ruggedness and suggesting the use of steel shutters for window protection.
  • There is a reference to a study post-Hurricane Andrew indicating that hip roofs may perform better than gabled roofs in hurricane conditions.
  • Some participants propose that house shapes approximating an egg could enhance hurricane resistance, referencing past experiments with gunite buildings in Florida.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of current building codes, particularly in flood-prone areas like the Florida Keys, where pilings are required to elevate homes.
  • One participant suggests a design where houses could rise with floodwaters, using a hexagonal pattern of pilings for stability.
  • There are mentions of newer homes built to updated standards that reportedly survived recent hurricanes without damage.
  • Participants discuss the broader implications of building in disaster-prone areas, with some arguing against it while others highlight the challenges of relocating populations.
  • Impact-resistant windows and doors are suggested as additional protective measures, along with innovative construction ideas like watertight garages for tornado shelters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on housing design and construction methods for hurricane resistance, with no clear consensus on the best approach. Disagreements exist regarding the effectiveness of various strategies and the implications of building in vulnerable areas.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various factors influencing housing resilience, such as soil composition, drainage, and local topography, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to architects, engineers, urban planners, and individuals involved in disaster preparedness and housing development in hurricane-prone regions.

Noisy Rhysling
Messages
999
Reaction score
345
My first thought on this is how to avoid standing water damage. After massive flooding in this area in '08 houses were jacked up about eight feet. (Based, I think, on the "100 year" flood model and the catch-basin effect of water crossing over the railroad right-of-way.) Would Cat 5 winds cause a stilted house to blow away more easily, all else being equal?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Its not a clean cut answer, there is so much information that has to be considered: Height of the structure; topography of the land; Soil composition; Foundation depth and type. After studying Construction for 3 years I would argue that if we change our approach to housing design and integrate structures into natural features rather than plowing everything flat, we could make it affordable and more durable in the future. I believe that we will start seeing more aerodynamic structures which have greatly reduced wind forces Soon . It will be like the automative industry. There is a nice PDF on the topic if you want to have a look.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Noisy Rhysling
Thanks. I was already thinking about "Bag End" (Frodo's house) as a candidate. Built into the side of a hill it would be quite rugged. Steel shutters that would fill in the gaps in the ground contours where the windows are would be needed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tracey3
Noisy Rhysling said:
Thanks. I was already thinking about "Bag End" (Frodo's house) as a candidate. Built into the side of a hill it would be quite rugged. Steel shutters that would fill in the gaps in the ground contours where the windows are would be needed.

It is a great idea with the main things to consider being the soil composition and drainage. There was an instance were due to the house sinking it actually shifted and started looking like it was getting engulfed by the ground. Here is a design that is a middle ground and I personally love it!
 
Tracey3 said:
It is a great idea with the main things to consider being the soil composition and drainage. There was an instance were due to the house sinking it actually shifted and started looking like it was getting engulfed by the ground. Here is a design that is a middle ground and I personally love it!
That wind tunnel would make me nervous.
 
probably the closer it approximates an egg the more hurricane resistant

fifty years ago they experimented with gunite buildings in the Florida Keys that resembled turtle shells. . They're still standing, seems a natural enough design to copy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noisy Rhysling
Hills in southern Florida are scarce.

New houses in the Keys require 15 foot (5 m) pilings to lift them off the ground. But FEMA won't guarantee that they won't raise the minimum higher next year and they won't grandfather the 15 foot ones. Tsk tsk.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noisy Rhysling
anorlunda said:
New houses in the Keys require 15 foot (5 m) pilings to lift them off the ground. But FEMA won't guarantee that they won't raise the minimum higher next year and they won't grandfather the 15 foot ones. Tsk tsk.
Sounds like a case of "caveat emptor" vs. "Hey FEMA, cover my bad decisions"
 
  • #10
15 feet seems ample for storm surge. But adding wave action on top of that may be borderline.

The key would seem to be to create a house shape that is either lift neutral or negative lift, as well as being low drag. Worse it has to be this for all directions. I have a mental image of a circular airfoil with a thickness diameter of 10 to 1 or so. Big house.

In building such a house, I think I'd want to use 35 foot poles with 12 feet underground, and the poles fastened into the entire house structure.
 
  • #11
What about having the house rise with the waters? Piling go through the house and are tied together at the top to stop any further rise. Hexagonal pattern of pilings, all outside the house proper.
 
  • #12
By the way, a TV report on hurricane Irma pointed at neighborhoods of newer homes across the bay on Marco Island. They were built with the new standards adopted after hurricane Andrew. The reporter said that they all appeared to come though with no damage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noisy Rhysling
  • #13
anorlunda said:
By the way, a TV report on hurricane Irma pointed at neighborhoods of newer homes across the bay on Marco Island. They were built with the new standards adopted after hurricane Andrew. The reporter said that they all appeared to come though with no damage.
It is better not to build cities in places prone to the violence of Nature. Otherwise we have self inflicted disasters and no one wants to see that happen.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #14
Flooding occurs because the water has nowhere to go.
River forelands around rivers are the classical way to tackle flooding.
They are designed to take in excess water.
Tokyo has gone beyond. They have built water discharge tunnels, which were completed in 2006.
 
  • #15
tech99 said:
It is better not to build cities in places prone to the violence of Nature. Otherwise we have self inflicted disasters and no one wants to see that happen.

That's easier said than done. Hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, fires, earthquakes, volcanic activities, blizzards, ice storms, sea level rise, heat waves, sand storms, landslides, sink holes, avalanches, locusts. That rules out most of North America. I once lived in Sweden. Almost none of those things happen there. I wonder if they can fit an additional 7 billion people? :rolleyes:
 
  • #16
Even impact windows and doors can help you in this.
 
  • #17
William Adams said:
Even impact windows and doors can help you in this.
Yeah, 1/4" Plexiglas panels, removable, would help. Cover at least two sides with those. A foam insulation that is also watertight/waterproof could be used during construction.

I think one of the best ideas I've heard is to build the house over the garage. That gives you ~eight feet of height right off the bat. "Get your basement out of the ground!" You could make a section of that garage watertight and accessible from the house above, for a tornado shelter. In some places having the kitchen on the ground floor would reduce the heat in the house proper as well.
 
  • #18
anorlunda said:
That's easier said than done. Hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, fires, earthquakes, volcanic activities, blizzards, ice storms, sea level rise, heat waves, sand storms, landslides, sink holes, avalanches, locusts. That rules out most of North America. I once lived in Sweden. Almost none of those things happen there. I wonder if they can fit an additional 7 billion people? :rolleyes:

Don't forget the Caldera (supervolcano) under Yellowstone park that is supposed to erupt like clockwork, which is already about 50000 years overdue if I'm not mistaken, and which would effectively wipe the US off the map. And the mega tsunami that would occur if part of an island would fall into the Atlantic, wiping the east coast off the map, including New York. Yep, Sweden does sound like a better choice. :oldwink:
 
  • #19
I like Serena said:
Don't forget the Caldera (supervolcano) under Yellowstone park that is supposed to erupt like clockwork, which is already about 50000 years overdue if I'm not mistaken, and which would effectively wipe the US off the map. And the mega tsunami that would occur if part of an island would fall into the Atlantic, wiping the east coast off the map, including New York. Yep, Sweden does sound like a better choice. :oldwink:
The Yellowstone monster seems to grow in size and danger every year.
 
  • #20
Noisy Rhysling said:
The Yellowstone monster seems to grow in size and danger every year.

Yep. Still, the probability is less than about 1 in 10000 that it will happen within a year or so... which is generally considered to be negligible... but it is bound to happen sometime...

Additionally, we have the island La Palma in the Canary islands, that is known to be volcanic. As such there is a risk that part of the island falls into the ocean. When and if that happens, it will generate a megatsunami that will hit the US... and it doesn't seem likely that the people in New York will be able to evacuate in a timely fashion...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K