- #1
icvotria
- 51
- 1
Sorry if I'm starting up anpther big semantics discussion ( ), that's not my intention at all. I'm just looking for a proper scientific answer (or a proper scientific dismissal : ) )to a question. I was reading through t'other nothing thread and read something like 'nothing is the opposite of something' and so now I'm thinking that if nothing is defined as the opposite of something then something must be defined as the opposite of nothing so the two must coexist. Or is the opposite of all the something that there is stuff like antimatter that I haven't read enough about and don't understand and the something/nothing question lies wholly outside of the realms of physics?