- #1

Could someone please show me a very easy agebraic example of U-Substitution?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter tomas
- Start date

- #1

Could someone please show me a very easy agebraic example of U-Substitution?

- #2

∫(2x+1)

There are actually two ways for us to solve this problem:

(1) Expand the integrand and the integrate the polynomial.

(2) Perform a u-subtitution.

The easier method is clearly the second and it's what you want to know how to do anyway.

We find a subexpression to set u equal to (in this case it is fairly obvious):

u = (2x+1)

Then we find the derivative of this subexpression:

du/dx = 2

We multiply and divide the integrand by this derivative as follows (note that this simply means multiplying by one):

∫(2x+1)

∫(1/2)(u)

If you remember the chain rule for derivatives, then you'll also remember that the derivative of f(u(x)) = f'(u(x))u'(x). Well, Our integrand is already in this form now. To find its antiderivative, we can ignore the u'(x) and integrate f'(u) (w/ respect to u) to find f(u) and then simply change the formula back to f(u(x)) to obtain the final antiderivative.

Following through with this we obtain:

∫(1/2)u

(1/8)u

(1/8)*(2x+1)

- #3

Sting

- 157

- 2

Suppose you have:

[inte][2x(x

You can solve this by u-substitution because if you let u = x2 + 1, then du = 2x.

[inte][u

One thing about u substitution is that you should pick a u where du is in the integrand.

- #4

StephenPrivitera

- 363

- 0

I like to treat "dx"s and "du"s like factors in the equation. It makes the problem seem a lot more algebra-y, and people like algebra. Some people throw du's and dx's on then end because they know they should, not because they think it means something.

Anyway, here's a fun example.

[inte] xdx/(bx+a)

let u = bx+a

then, du=bdx

since no "bdx" exists in the integrand, you have to solve the equation for something that does, ie, dx

(In my math class, the teacher taught us to rewrite the integrand to make it fit the du/dx equation. I feel that it's a lot clearer to rewrite the du/dx equation to make it fit the integrand.)

dx=du/b

replace dx with du/b and bx+a with u

[inte] x(du/b)/(u)

since u=bx+a

x=(u-a)/b

replace x with (u-a)/b

[inte] [(u-a)/b](du/b)/(u)

From there, just a little algebra and you get:

1/b

- #5

xRAWRx6

- 1

- 0

Just in case anyone else falls upon this thread, i'll post one more problem.

(inte)(3x+4)^8 dx

u=3x+4

du=3dx

du/3=dx

plug your dx back into your original equation

(inte)(u)^8 (du/3)

1/3(inte)(u)^8 du

(1/3)(1/9)(u)^9 +c

(1/27)(3x+4)^9 + c

Share:

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 668

- Last Post

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 925

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 705

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 779

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 435

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 631

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 721

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 548

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 2K