Agh cant get this

  • Thread starter philo51
  • Start date
  • #1
philo51
10
0
A bored college student decides to try bungee jumping. He attaches an elastic bungee cord to his ankles and happily jumps off a tall bridge across a river. He ends up barely touching the water before the cord jerks him back up

The length of the relaxed cord is y_e; the distance from the bridge to the river surface is y_0 (where y_o>y_e), and the spring constant of the elastic cord is k.

Which assumptions are reasonable to make in this problem?

a.The student can be treated as a particle moving with constant speed.
b.The student can be treated as a particle moving with constant acceleration.
c.The student cannot be treated as a particle.
d.The air resistance is substantial.
e.The air resistance is negligible.
f.The amount of heat generated in the bungee cord is substantial.
g.The amount of heat generated in the bungee cord is negligible.
h.The bungee cord applies a constant (or zero) force on the student.
i.e bungee cord can be modeled as a spring that obeys Hooke's law.

i put B,E,G,I and that was wrong. any suggestions?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
43,021
970
He ties the bungee cord to his ankles. What part of his body "barely touches the river"? What is the distance between his ankles (the end of the bungee cord) and the surface of the river at that instant? What's wrong with treating him as a "particle"?
 

Suggested for: Agh cant get this

Replies
7
Views
432
Replies
1
Views
368
Replies
1
Views
190
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
499
Replies
17
Views
568
Replies
8
Views
657
Replies
4
Views
351
Replies
9
Views
557
Top