1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Agh cant get this

  1. Aug 13, 2005 #1
    A bored college student decides to try bungee jumping. He attaches an elastic bungee cord to his ankles and happily jumps off a tall bridge across a river. He ends up barely touching the water before the cord jerks him back up

    The length of the relaxed cord is y_e; the distance from the bridge to the river surface is y_0 (where y_o>y_e), and the spring constant of the elastic cord is k.

    Which assumptions are reasonable to make in this problem?

    a.The student can be treated as a particle moving with constant speed.
    b.The student can be treated as a particle moving with constant acceleration.
    c.The student cannot be treated as a particle.
    d.The air resistance is substantial.
    e.The air resistance is negligible.
    f.The amount of heat generated in the bungee cord is substantial.
    g.The amount of heat generated in the bungee cord is negligible.
    h.The bungee cord applies a constant (or zero) force on the student.
    i.e bungee cord can be modeled as a spring that obeys Hooke's law.

    i put B,E,G,I and that was wrong. any suggestions?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 13, 2005 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    He ties the bungee cord to his ankles. What part of his body "barely touches the river"? What is the distance between his ankles (the end of the bungee cord) and the surface of the river at that instant? What's wrong with treating him as a "particle"?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Agh cant get this
  1. I cant get started (Replies: 1)

Loading...