Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Alejandro's new paper on the arxiv

  1. Apr 20, 2004 #1

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    this just out

    posted by one of our locals from the PF hood: arivero

    Congratulations! Way to go!

    part of the paper was first presented in a PF thread by arivero
    or rather he explored the ideas here that then contributed to
    developing the paper

    http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0404086
    "Some minor examples on discrete geometry"
    Alejandro Rivero
    Tue, 20 Apr 2004
    3 pages

    Assuming a minimum value for area measurement, the emergence of quantum mechanics can be easily motivated from naive consideration of gravitational force. Here we provide some pedagogical examples and extensions.
    At the same time, the role of Planck mass is shown to be of some theoretical influence even at low energies.
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 20, 2004 #2
    He even cites physicsforums in the references
    And marcus, you are also cited in the text!
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2004
  4. Apr 20, 2004 #3

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    that was nice of him, I did not have anything to do with developing the ideas I just enjoyed them when they appeared on that thread. I will try to find the thread
     
  5. Apr 20, 2004 #4

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    it was Alejandro's "kepler length" thread

    "kepler length"
    https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=14007

    I think it has some of the same ideas as the paper

    it begins with a kind of riddle, which I remember answering
    (this displeased Alejandro, so he edited in some space so
    that readers would not see the answer in the next post and so
    they would have a chance to think about it for themselves: a good idea too)
     
  6. Apr 21, 2004 #5

    arivero

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yep, Marcus (et al), the note is a straight translation of two PF threads. While it is not high research, I thought that it was a interesting exchange, and not every gr-qc reader reads physicsforums.

    And no, I was not displeased by your fast answer... Simply I understood that if you are living most of the internet here between PF and the arxiv, probably you were missing some old e-traditions about spoilers :-)

    (I hope not to raise a bad precedent. If some "theory development" poster is tempted to go this way, let me note that only the http://arxiv.org/archive/physics was traditionally available for this purpose, all the others being banned)
     
  7. Apr 21, 2004 #6
    ???

    I simply do not understand this last paragraph, perhaps because I do not read archive/physics. Does this means that /physics has different rules tradition or "culture" than /gr-qc or/quant-ph? If so, what is the difference? I am confused. TIA for enlightening me. Jim Graber
     
  8. Apr 22, 2004 #7

    arivero

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Well, time ago before the "university affiliation" rule, very speculative or poor papers in the arxiv were detected and removed by hand. It seems that the admins felt no very good about doing this -it is a personal, referee like, criteria, after all-, so they decided to move them to /physics.general (denying crosspost at the same time, by the way) instead of plainly rejecting them.

    While the new rules do not imply a continuity in this tradition, they seem to suggest that old posters of /physics will be still able to upload new papers to the .general area, and if they are given "endorser" status, they will also be able to authorize new users into this section of the arxiv. So one could expect the tradition to perpetuate, even if now it is not manually enforced anymore.
     
  9. Apr 22, 2004 #8
    Thanks, I had never heard any of that. Jim Graber
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Alejandro's new paper on the arxiv
  1. Arivero paper on arxiv (Replies: 14)

  2. New Arxiv stats (Replies: 4)

Loading...