Alexander-Whiteney duality

  • Thread starter wofsy
  • Start date
  • #1
709
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

What is Alexander-Whitney duality?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
166
0
It's not a common term, but I assume you are really referring to the Alexander-Whitney map.

If [tex]X[/tex], [tex]Y[/tex] are topological spaces, then the AW map is the natural transformation between:

[tex] (X, Y) \mapsto Sing (X \times Y) [/tex] and [tex] Sing (X) \otimes Sing (Y) [/tex]

Where [tex]Sing[/tex] is total singular chain complex for the specified top. space.

Since it's a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_transformation" [Broken], it could be labeled a duality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
17
Since it's a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_transformation" [Broken], it could be labeled a duality.
At the risk of derailing the thread... how? :confused: Dualities are typically expressible as contravariant functors -- the closest "natural transformation" gets to the notion of duality is there is typically a natural transformation (usually isomorphism) from an object to the dual of its dual.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads for: Alexander-Whiteney duality

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Top