Almost embarrasingly simple

  • Thread starter captainnofun
  • Start date
In summary, a person needs to walk with a velocity of V in order to reach a depth D of 1 and 1/2 miles within 1 or 2 hours depending on the desired time frame. The slope of the tunnel must be calculated using the inverse sine function with the depth and velocity values.
  • #1
captainnofun
1
0
Hi, I'm new to the forum, and loathe to admit that I'm well out of high school and have the mathematical knowledge of a snowpea. Can anyone help me with the following scenario?

A person drops down a 200 ft. vertical shaft. Now underground, they will travel through a tunnel at a downward slope until they reach a depth of 1 and 1/2 miles. My question is, how steep do I need to make my slope? Since they are walking, it would need to be shallow enough that they can comfortably remain upright, but also steep enough that they will reach their target depth within 1 hour, 2 hours if it's more logical. I appreciate any help you guys can give me!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For simplicity, let the velocity they travel with be called V, and the time to reach their destination T (in your case 1 or 2 hours).

Thus, the length L of the tunnel must be L=VT
Agreed so far?

Now, as measured from the starting point of the tunnel, the target point lies a depth D beneath it, (D equals 1 and a half miles in your case)

Now, D and L can be seen as two sides in a right-angled triangle, agreed?
(L is the hypotenuse of this triangle!)

The slope is the angle between the horizontal side H of this triangle and L.

In general, if we let [itex]\theta[/itex] denote the slope angle, we have:
[tex]\theta=\sin^{-1}(\frac{D}{L})=\sin^{-1}(\frac{D}{VT})[/tex]
where [itex]\sin^{-1}()[/itex] is the inverse sine.

As you can see, you must know what the traveling velocity is in order to calculate the slope angle.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


Hi there! Don't worry about your mathematical knowledge, we all have different areas of expertise and it's great that you're seeking help on this forum.

To answer your question, the slope of the tunnel would need to be approximately 1.5 degrees for the person to reach a depth of 1.5 miles within 1 hour. This can be calculated using the formula for slope, which is rise over run. In this case, the rise would be 1.5 miles (7920 feet) and the run would be 200 feet.

So the slope would be calculated as (7920/200) x 100 = 3.96 degrees. This is slightly steeper than what you were looking for, so if you want to make the slope more gradual, you can adjust the time frame accordingly. For example, if you want the person to reach the target depth in 2 hours, the slope can be reduced to 1.98 degrees.

I hope this helps and good luck with your scenario!
 

What does "almost embarrassingly simple" mean?

"Almost embarrassingly simple" refers to a concept, idea, or solution that is so basic and straightforward that it may seem obvious or even silly. However, this phrase is often used in a positive light to describe something that is easy to understand and implement.

Can "almost embarrassingly simple" ideas be effective?

Yes, "almost embarrassingly simple" ideas can be very effective. In fact, simplicity is often key to success in science and other fields. By eliminating unnecessary complexity, simple ideas can be easier to understand, replicate, and build upon.

Why are some scientific discoveries described as "almost embarrassingly simple"?

Some scientific discoveries may be described as "almost embarrassingly simple" because they may challenge traditional or complex theories and offer a surprisingly simple explanation or solution. These discoveries may also seem obvious in hindsight, making them appear simple.

Do researchers actively seek out "almost embarrassingly simple" solutions?

Yes, researchers often strive to find simple and elegant solutions to problems. This allows for easier understanding and application of their findings, and can also lead to more efficient and cost-effective solutions.

Are "almost embarrassingly simple" solutions always the best?

No, while simple solutions can be effective, they may not always be the best or most comprehensive. In some cases, complex problems may require complex solutions. It is important for scientists to carefully evaluate all options and consider the potential limitations of simple solutions.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
976
Back
Top